forked from FRRouting/frr
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] zebra srv6 manager cleanup (1) #8
Open
slankdev
wants to merge
60
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
slankdev-zebra-srv6-manager-cleanup-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 that add new cmd-node for SRv6 configuration. This commit just add cmd-node and moving node cli only, acutual SRv6 config command isn't added. (that is added later commit. of this branch) new cli nodes: * SR * SRv6 * SRv6-locators * SRv6-locator Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
Make seg6local_context2str function's prototype better. This function is added on commit e496b42, and function interface's considering wasn't enough. Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 works that add new nexthop's addional object for SRv6 routing about seg6local route. Before this commit, we can add MPLS info as additional object on nexthop. This commit make it add more support about seg6local routes. seg6local routes are ones of the LWT routing mechanism, so configuration of seg6local routes is performed by ZEBRA_ROUTE_SEND, it's same as MPLS configuration. Real configuration implementation isn't implemented at this commit. later commit add that. This commit add only nexthop additional object and some misc functions. Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 works that add new structures of SRv6-locator/function. This structure will be used by zebra and another routing daemon to manage SRv6-locator/function. These structure will be used by ZAPI datapath, encoder/decoder for ZAPI stream is also added by this commit. Real configure implementation isn't implemented at this commit. later commit add real configure implementation. This commit add only SRv6-locator/function's structures and misc functions. Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 works that add new ZAPI to configure SRv6 routing mechanism with seg6local LTW route. NEW-ZAPIs: * ZEBRA_SRV6_LOCATOR_ADD * ZEBRA_SRV6_LOCATOR_DELETE * ZEBRA_SRV6_FUNCTION_ADD * ZEBRA_SRV6_FUNCTION_DELETE If user or routing daemon create new SRv6-locator or function on zebra, zserv(zebra) notifiy that creation context to each zclient. zclient can know this notification some SRv6-locator or function are created on zebra. And, zclient can add/delete SRv6-locator and function to call this apis. Thus in this ZAPI, direction (from zclient to zserv or else) is important. This commit also make zebra data-plane maanger to support seg6local route. so after this commit. Zebra can support to configure seg6local route as SRv6 local function. Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 works that add new clis to configure SRv6 dataplane. Following clis are added on this commit. - "show segment-routing srv6 sid [json]" - "show segment-routing srv6 locator [json]" - "show runnning-config" (make it to print srv6 configuration) Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is a part of FRRouting#5853 works. This commit add new topotest to verify SRv6-manager's functionality. Following tests are performed on this topotest. - check that SRv6-locator is set correctly - check that default SRv6-function locator is set correctly - check that SRv6-function is installed as ipv6 route correctly Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hiroki Shirokura <slank.dev@gmail.com>
slankdev
changed the title
[WIP] zebra srv6 manager cleanup 1
[WIP] zebra srv6 manager cleanup (1)
Oct 10, 2020
slankdev
force-pushed
the
slankdev-zebra-srv6-manager-cleanup-1
branch
from
October 11, 2020 07:47
85f9123
to
3cf27b2
Compare
slankdev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2020
When zebra is running with debugs turned on there is a use after free reported by the address sanitizer: 2020/10/16 12:58:02 ZEBRA: rib_delnode: (0:254):4.5.6.16/32: rn 0x60b000026f20, re 0x6080000131a0, removing 2020/10/16 12:58:02 ZEBRA: rib_meta_queue_add: (0:254):4.5.6.16/32: queued rn 0x60b000026f20 into sub-queue 3 ================================================================= ==3101430==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x608000011d28 at pc 0x555555705ab6 bp 0x7fffffffdab0 sp 0x7fffffffdaa8 READ of size 8 at 0x608000011d28 thread T0 #0 0x555555705ab5 in re_list_const_first zebra/rib.h:222 #1 0x555555705b54 in re_list_first zebra/rib.h:222 #2 0x555555711a4f in process_subq_route zebra/zebra_rib.c:2248 #3 0x555555711d2e in process_subq zebra/zebra_rib.c:2286 #4 0x555555711ec7 in meta_queue_process zebra/zebra_rib.c:2320 #5 0x7ffff74701f7 in work_queue_run lib/workqueue.c:291 #6 0x7ffff7450e9c in thread_call lib/thread.c:1581 #7 0x7ffff738eaf7 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1099 #8 0x55555561a578 in main zebra/main.c:455 #9 0x7ffff7079cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 #10 0x5555555e3429 in _start (/usr/lib/frr/zebra+0x8f429) 0x608000011d28 is located 8 bytes inside of 88-byte region [0x608000011d20,0x608000011d78) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x7ffff768bb6f in __interceptor_free (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.6+0xa9b6f) #1 0x7ffff739ccad in qfree lib/memory.c:129 #2 0x555555709ee4 in rib_gc_dest zebra/zebra_rib.c:746 #3 0x55555570ca76 in rib_process zebra/zebra_rib.c:1240 #4 0x555555711a05 in process_subq_route zebra/zebra_rib.c:2245 #5 0x555555711d2e in process_subq zebra/zebra_rib.c:2286 #6 0x555555711ec7 in meta_queue_process zebra/zebra_rib.c:2320 #7 0x7ffff74701f7 in work_queue_run lib/workqueue.c:291 #8 0x7ffff7450e9c in thread_call lib/thread.c:1581 #9 0x7ffff738eaf7 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1099 #10 0x55555561a578 in main zebra/main.c:455 #11 0x7ffff7079cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7ffff768c037 in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.6+0xaa037) #1 0x7ffff739cb98 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:110 #2 0x555555712ace in zebra_rib_create_dest zebra/zebra_rib.c:2515 #3 0x555555712c6c in rib_link zebra/zebra_rib.c:2576 #4 0x555555712faa in rib_addnode zebra/zebra_rib.c:2607 #5 0x555555715bf0 in rib_add_multipath_nhe zebra/zebra_rib.c:3012 #6 0x555555715f56 in rib_add_multipath zebra/zebra_rib.c:3049 #7 0x55555571788b in rib_add zebra/zebra_rib.c:3327 #8 0x5555555e584a in connected_up zebra/connected.c:254 #9 0x5555555e42ff in connected_announce zebra/connected.c:94 #10 0x5555555e4fd3 in connected_update zebra/connected.c:195 #11 0x5555555e61ad in connected_add_ipv4 zebra/connected.c:340 #12 0x5555555f26f5 in netlink_interface_addr zebra/if_netlink.c:1213 #13 0x55555560f756 in netlink_information_fetch zebra/kernel_netlink.c:350 #14 0x555555612e49 in netlink_parse_info zebra/kernel_netlink.c:941 #15 0x55555560f9f1 in kernel_read zebra/kernel_netlink.c:402 FRRouting#16 0x7ffff7450e9c in thread_call lib/thread.c:1581 FRRouting#17 0x7ffff738eaf7 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1099 FRRouting#18 0x55555561a578 in main zebra/main.c:455 FRRouting#19 0x7ffff7079cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free zebra/rib.h:222 in re_list_const_first This is happening because we are using the dest pointer after a call into rib_gc_dest. In process_subq_route, we call rib_process() and if the dest is deleted dest pointer is now garbage. We must reload the dest pointer in this case. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
slankdev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2020
We are using data after it has been freed and handed back to the OS. Address Sanitizer output: error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x631000024838 at pc 0x55f825998f58 bp 0x7fffa5b0f5b0 sp 0x7fffa5b0f5a0 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 READ of size 4 at 0x631000024838 thread T0 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #0 0x55f825998f57 in lde_imsg_compose_parent_sync ldpd/lde.c:226 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #1 0x55f8259ca9ed in vlog ldpd/log.c:48 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #2 0x55f8259cb1c8 in log_info ldpd/log.c:102 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #3 0x55f82599e841 in lde_shutdown ldpd/lde.c:208 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #4 0x55f8259a2703 in lde_dispatch_parent ldpd/lde.c:666 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #5 0x55f825ac3815 in thread_call lib/thread.c:1681 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #6 0x55f825998d5e in lde ldpd/lde.c:160 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #7 0x55f82598a289 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:320 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #8 0x7fe3f749db96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #9 0x55f825982579 in _start (/usr/lib/frr/ldpd+0xb3579) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 0x631000024838 is located 65592 bytes inside of 65632-byte region [0x631000014800,0x631000024860) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 freed by thread T0 here: error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #0 0x7fe3f8a4d7a8 in __interceptor_free (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xde7a8) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #1 0x55f82599e830 in lde_shutdown ldpd/lde.c:206 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #2 0x55f8259a2703 in lde_dispatch_parent ldpd/lde.c:666 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #3 0x55f825ac3815 in thread_call lib/thread.c:1681 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #4 0x55f825998d5e in lde ldpd/lde.c:160 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #5 0x55f82598a289 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:320 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #6 0x7fe3f749db96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 previously allocated by thread T0 here: error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #0 0x7fe3f8a4dd28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #1 0x55f825998cb7 in lde ldpd/lde.c:151 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #2 0x55f82598a289 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:320 error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 #3 0x7fe3f749db96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) error 23-Nov-2020 18:53:57 The fix is to put this in global space. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
slankdev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2020
error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x631000024838 at pc 0x55cefae977e9 bp 0x7ffdd3546860 sp 0x7ffdd3546850 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 READ of size 4 at 0x631000024838 thread T0 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #0 0x55cefae977e8 in ldpe_imsg_compose_parent_sync ldpd/ldpe.c:256 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #1 0x55cefae9ab13 in vlog ldpd/log.c:53 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #2 0x55cefae9b21f in log_info ldpd/log.c:102 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #3 0x55cefae96eae in ldpe_shutdown ldpd/ldpe.c:237 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #4 0x55cefae99254 in ldpe_dispatch_main ldpd/ldpe.c:585 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #5 0x55cefaf93875 in thread_call lib/thread.c:1681 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #6 0x55cefae97304 in ldpe ldpd/ldpe.c:136 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #7 0x55cefae5a2e2 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:322 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #8 0x7f4ef0c33b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #9 0x55cefae525e9 in _start (/usr/lib/frr/ldpd+0xb35e9) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 0x631000024838 is located 65592 bytes inside of 65632-byte region [0x631000014800,0x631000024860) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 freed by thread T0 here: error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #0 0x7f4ef21e37a8 in __interceptor_free (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xde7a8) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #1 0x55cefae96e91 in ldpe_shutdown ldpd/ldpe.c:234 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #2 0x55cefae99254 in ldpe_dispatch_main ldpd/ldpe.c:585 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #3 0x55cefaf93875 in thread_call lib/thread.c:1681 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #4 0x55cefae97304 in ldpe ldpd/ldpe.c:136 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #5 0x55cefae5a2e2 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:322 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #6 0x7f4ef0c33b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 previously allocated by thread T0 here: error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #0 0x7f4ef21e3d28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28) error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #1 0x55cefae9725d in ldpe ldpd/ldpe.c:127 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #2 0x55cefae5a2e2 in main ldpd/ldpd.c:322 error 26-Nov-2020 14:35:02 #3 0x7f4ef0c33b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) Clean this problem up in the same way as the previous commit Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
slankdev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2021
Our Address Sanitizer CI is finding this issue: error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 r4: bgpd triggered an exception by AddressSanitizer error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdd425b060 at pc 0x00000068575f bp 0x7ffdd4258550 sp 0x7ffdd4258540 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 READ of size 1 at 0x7ffdd425b060 thread T0 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #0 0x68575e in prefix_cmp lib/prefix.c:776 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #1 0x5889f5 in rfapiItBiIndexSearch bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c:2230 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #2 0x5889f5 in rfapiBgpInfoFilteredImportVPN bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c:3520 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #3 0x58b909 in rfapiProcessWithdraw bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c:4071 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #4 0x4c459b in bgp_withdraw bgpd/bgp_route.c:3736 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #5 0x484122 in bgp_nlri_parse_vpn bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:237 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #6 0x497f52 in bgp_nlri_parse bgpd/bgp_packet.c:315 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #7 0x49d06d in bgp_update_receive bgpd/bgp_packet.c:1598 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #8 0x49d06d in bgp_process_packet bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2274 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #9 0x6b9f54 in thread_call lib/thread.c:1531 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #10 0x657037 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1052 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #11 0x42d268 in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:486 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #12 0x7f806032482f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2082f) error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #13 0x42bcc8 in _start (/usr/lib/frr/bgpd+0x42bcc8) error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Address 0x7ffdd425b060 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 240 in frame error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 #0 0x483945 in bgp_nlri_parse_vpn bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:103 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 This frame has 5 object(s): error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 [32, 36) 'label' error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 [96, 108) 'rd_as' error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 [160, 172) 'rd_ip' error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 [224, 240) 'prd' <== Memory access at offset 240 overflows this variable error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 [288, 336) 'p' error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism or swapcontext error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported) error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow lib/prefix.c:776 prefix_cmp error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Shadow bytes around the buggy address: error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a8435b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a8435c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a8435d0: f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a8435e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a8435f0: f1 f1 04 f4 f4 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 04 f4 f4 f2 f2 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 =>0x10003a843600: f2 f2 00 04 f4 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00[f4]f4 f2 f2 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a843610: f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f4 f4 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a843620: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a843630: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 02 f4 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a843640: f4 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 04 f4 f4 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 0x10003a843650: f4 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Addressable: 00 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Heap left redzone: fa error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Heap right redzone: fb error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Freed heap region: fd error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack left redzone: f1 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack mid redzone: f2 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack right redzone: f3 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack partial redzone: f4 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack after return: f5 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Stack use after scope: f8 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Global redzone: f9 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Global init order: f6 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Poisoned by user: f7 error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Container overflow: fc error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Array cookie: ac error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 Intra object redzone: bb error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:33 ASan internal: fe error 09-Oct-2019 19:28:36 r3: Daemon bgpd not running This is the result of this code pattern in rfapi/rfapi_import.c: prefix_cmp((struct prefix *)&bpi_result->extra->vnc.import.rd, (struct prefix *)prd)) Effectively prd or vnc.import.rd are `struct prefix_rd` which are being typecast to a `struct prefix`. Not a big deal except commit 1315d74 modified the prefix_cmp function to allow for a sorted prefix_cmp. In prefix_cmp we were looking at the offset and shift. In the case of vnc we were passing a prefix length of 64 which is the exact length of the remaining data structure for struct prefix_rd. So we calculated a offset of 8 and a shift of 0. The data structures for the prefix portion happened to be equal to 64 bits of data. So we checked that with the memcmp got a 0 and promptly read off the end of the data structure for the numcmp. The fix is if shift is 0 that means thei the memcmp has checked everything and there is nothing to do. Please note: We will still crash if we set the prefixlen > then ~312 bits currently( ie if the prefixlen specifies a bit length longer than the prefix length ). I do not think there is anything to do here( nor am I sure how to correct this either ) as that we are going to have some severe problems when we muck up the prefixlen. Fixes: FRRouting#5025 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Schedule
basic
show segment-routing srv6 locator NAME
show bgp segment-routing srv6
show segment-routing srv6 manager
ボーナスステージ
BGPd backport