Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upBinary dasymetric method #2
Comments
|
This would be a great enhancement to add. Many municipalities' taxlot data or building footprint data often contains the number of residential units that are at a location. These are effectively point-level ancillary data, and they could be used to help increase the accuracy of weighting appropriately. The same could be done using LEHD/LODES data, which contains the number of workers at the census block level. Other tests could be performed to see if the spatial distribution of labor force participation is heavily skewed, which might inform whether the LODES block-level data would be insufficient. |
|
Thanks @plnnr! Glad to know this would be useful to you. I'll keep you updated on our development here. |
|
Interesting package, I'm working in ArcMap currently but might have to utilize this soon. As far as the even distribution assumption within census tracts for example, there are arguments for both sides to consider depending on your level of granularity. If working with block group, census tracts, or above you can just utilize the block data to filter out any industrial areas or parks as there population would be 0, Census Tracts have much more conisistent populations compared to other geographies I have seen. Parcel data is more ideal however. I would not advise making an even distribution assumption for legislative related boundaries, as they are manipulated and imbalanced for a reason. They do align with census block lines however so you can utilize this method for weighting the possibility of the event being interpolated. |
Adding functionality for this approach is a long term goal, and this issue will serve as a venue for discussion / documenting progress on it.