Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Binary dasymetric method #2

Open
chris-prener opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #27
Open

Binary dasymetric method #2

chris-prener opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #27
Labels

Comments

@chris-prener
Copy link
Member

@chris-prener chris-prener commented Dec 17, 2018

Adding functionality for this approach is a long term goal, and this issue will serve as a venue for discussion / documenting progress on it.

@plnnr
Copy link

@plnnr plnnr commented Sep 3, 2019

This would be a great enhancement to add. Many municipalities' taxlot data or building footprint data often contains the number of residential units that are at a location. These are effectively point-level ancillary data, and they could be used to help increase the accuracy of weighting appropriately. The same could be done using LEHD/LODES data, which contains the number of workers at the census block level. Other tests could be performed to see if the spatial distribution of labor force participation is heavily skewed, which might inform whether the LODES block-level data would be insufficient.

@chris-prener
Copy link
Member Author

@chris-prener chris-prener commented Sep 4, 2019

Thanks @plnnr! Glad to know this would be useful to you. I'll keep you updated on our development here.

@KendallFrimodig
Copy link

@KendallFrimodig KendallFrimodig commented Feb 24, 2020

Interesting package, I'm working in ArcMap currently but might have to utilize this soon. As far as the even distribution assumption within census tracts for example, there are arguments for both sides to consider depending on your level of granularity. If working with block group, census tracts, or above you can just utilize the block data to filter out any industrial areas or parks as there population would be 0, Census Tracts have much more conisistent populations compared to other geographies I have seen. Parcel data is more ideal however. I would not advise making an even distribution assumption for legislative related boundaries, as they are manipulated and imbalanced for a reason. They do align with census block lines however so you can utilize this method for weighting the possibility of the event being interpolated.

@bransonf bransonf linked a pull request that will close this issue May 4, 2020
0 of 7 tasks complete
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.