RoarVM, formerly known as the Renaissance Virtual Machine (RVM) is developed as part of a IBM Research project to investigate programming paradigms and languages for manycore systems of the future. Specifically, this VM is meant to support manycore systems with more than 1000 cores in the future.
Today, the RoarVM supports the parallel execution of Smalltalk programs on x86 compatible multicore systems and Tilera TILE64-based manycore systems. It is tested with standard Squeak 4.1 closure-enabled images, and with a stripped down version of a MVC-based Squeak 3.9 image.
The RoarVM provides parallel execution of Smalltalk processes and thus, the programming model is a typical shared-memory model similar to Java with its threads and classical Pthreads for C/C++.
Please see the INSTALL.rst file.
The RoarVM is compatible with Squeak and its forks. However, the Smalltalk images needs a number of changes to enable it to utilize more than one core and to interact with the VM correctly.
- compatible with Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.2
- the RoarVM has full closure support
- Smalltalk processes are executed in parallel
- tested with 8 cores, 16 hyperthreads on Intel systems
- tested with 56 cores on Tilera TILE64/TILEPro64 processors
- tested with Linux and Mac OS X 10.6
The source code of the RoarVM has been released as open source to enable the Smalltalk community to evaluate the ideas and possibly integrate them into their existing systems. The RoarVM provides the necessary functionality to experiment with Smalltalk systems on multi- and manycore machines, which we would like to encourage.
However, we also welcome all contributions to the RoarVM itself. Either to bring it up to the speed of the existing VMs or to extend it for further experiments.
The RoarVM is a research project and is not as optimized for performance as the standard Squeak VM. Thus, its sequential performance is slower. This is due to the fact that the RoarVM misses optimizations like using the GCC label as value extension to speed up the interpreter.
- single core performance is slower than the Squeak VM
- Squeak 4.2.4beta1U, MVC image, OS X 554,844,390 bytecodes/sec; 12,213,718 sends/sec
- RoarVM, MVC image, OS X, 1 core 66,286,897 bytecodes/sec; 2,910,474 sends/sec
- RoarVM, MVC image, OS X, 8 cores 470,588,235 bytecodes/sec; 19,825,677 sends/sec
- idle process does not yield when the RoarVM is run on more than one core
- the event processing is not adapted fully yet, thus, the idle process is busy-waiting for performance reasons
- will drain your battery, on mobile devices
- Garbage collector is as simple as possible
- it is neither concurrent nor parallel
- performance can be problematic
- Graphical subsystem based on X11
- in contrast to todays Squeak VM, especially the OS X version, the RoarVM uses solely X11 and does not integrate as well into the OS as Squeak does
- Stability should be ok, however, crashes can happen occasionally
The implementation details of the RoarVM are currently documented in:
-  Hosting an Object Heap on Manycore Hardware: An Exploration,
- by David Ungar, and Sam S. Adams, in Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Dynamic Languages, ACM (2009), p. 99-110. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1640134.1640149
As well as an VEE submission which is currently under review.
Furthermore, the design is based on the following earlier work:
-  Multiprocessor Smalltalk: A Case Study of a Multiprocessor-Based
- Programming Environment by Joseph Pallas, and David Ungar, in Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1988 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, ACM (1988), p. 268-277. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=54017
The RoarVM resembles the Squeak VM which is written in Smalltalk/Slang, however, it is rewritten in C++ to facilitate the development on manycore architectures. The C source code of for instance plugins to the Squeak VM has been reused directly. This code is located in /src/from squeak/.
The support for x86 compatible multicore systems is currently based on POSIX threads. Thus, the RoarVM can be started with a number of threads which are executed on distinct processor cores. On Tilera TILE64-based systems, the iLib library is used and for each processor core a separate processes is started which executes an interpreter instance each. For both architectures, the VM provides the illusion of a single object heap, spanning all of the cores, to the Smalltalk user. Smalltalk processes are scheduled by a single scheduler on the available processor cores, and thus, the processes can execute in parallel. For synchronization, the standard Smalltalk mechanisms are available. Semaphores as well as mutexes work as in classical systems. Currently, the RoarVM uses a single central scheduler which is based on the design of Pallas. Its data structures are accessible from the image and only require minimal modifications to the image, since the do not change the general model of execution.
A distinct feature of the RoarVM is its use of an object table. It was introduced to reduce the necessary complexity to enable object migration between heaps on manycore architectures.
TODO: add some remarks on the heap structure
Copyright (c) 2008 - 2010 IBM Corporation and others. All rights reserved. This RoarVM and the accompanying materials are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution, and is available at:
All parts directly taken over from the original Squeak source code are licensed under their original licenses.
Since the RoarVM is based on the work which has been done for Squeak, we would like to acknowledge the Squeak community as a whole for its valuable work.
- The RoarVM was designed and implemented as 'Renaissance VM' by
- David Ungar and Sam Adams at IBM Research.
- It was ported to x86 compatible multicore systems by
- Stefan Marr at the Software Languages Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Special thanks go to Max OrHai for designing our logo.