Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: small changes to make docs checkpoint example functional #1714

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

EthanHolleman
Copy link
Contributor

@EthanHolleman EthanHolleman commented Jun 12, 2022

Description

This is a small PR to correct a few small errors in the documentation code example for using checkpoints when an arbitrary number of files is generated from a rule. This is under the Data-dependent conditional execution section.

Previously if you attempted to run this block you would get errors because the checkpoint rule is called somestep while the call to checkpoints uses export_sequences and rule all specified
aggregated.txt as the input but rule aggregate produced aggegated.txt as the output.

This codeblock is now run-able from my machine.

QC

  • The PR contains a test case for the changes or the changes are already covered by an existing test case.
  • The documentation (docs/) is updated to reflect the changes or this is not necessary (e.g. if the change does neither modify the language nor the behavior or functionalities of Snakemake).

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 12, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@EthanHolleman EthanHolleman changed the title Small changes to make docs checkpoint example functional fix: small changes to make docs checkpoint example functional Jun 13, 2022
@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit 1d4909e into snakemake:main Jun 15, 2022
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants