Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add mir to implicit for running gui snaps on unity8 classic desktop #1700

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

kgunnfront
Copy link

adding this will enable folks to create snaps for apps on unity8, which helps converge the untiy8 desktop as a daily driver with the snap world

@niemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

Do we want mir to show up in 16.04?

@kgunnfront
Copy link
Author

@niemeyer well, Mir is in main and has been for a long time (since 14.10 I think), unity8 desktop experience is in universe and we're working on placing unity8 in main for 16.10. Even without unity8-desktop, Mir can run on top of X actually (it's a tinker toy :) Do you foresee a problem or a risk of making the interface part of implicit classic?

@niemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

@kgunnfront It would feel slightly more polished to only expose that interface on systems that can actually run mir, but I don't have a big reason to block this either.

@niemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

@kgunn Sorry, but this will conflict once more once #1871 goes in. Luckily, though, the point of that PR is precisely to kill these repetitive conflicts due to dumb number bumping. Can you please merge @zyga's branch into this one, so that we can get both in without conflicts? I'm just waiting for tests to finish there before merging it.

@jdstrand There are some new changes here about /run/udev. I assume these are fine too?

@kgunnfront
Copy link
Author

apologies, i forgot i had this PR open. I need to remove the mir implicit portion and limit the PR to only the addition of the /run/udev/data paths

@kgunnfront kgunnfront closed this Sep 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants