Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Authentication when a pre-existing invalid token is stored [HEAD-1197] #4994

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

PeterSchafer
Copy link
Collaborator

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer commented Jan 8, 2024

Pull Request Submission

Please check the boxes once done.

The pull request must:

  • Reviewer Documentation
    • follow CONTRIBUTING rules
    • be accompanied by a detailed description of the changes
    • contain a risk assessment of the change (Low | Medium | High) with regards to breaking existing functionality. A change e.g. of an underlying language plugin can completely break the functionality for that language, but appearing as only a version change in the dependencies.
    • highlight breaking API if applicable
    • contain a link to the automatic tests that cover the updated functionality.
    • contain testing instructions in case that the reviewer wants to manual verify as well, to add to the manual testing done by the author.
    • link to the link to the PR for the User-facing documentation
  • User facing Documentation
    • update any relevant documentation in gitbook by submitting a gitbook PR, and including the PR link here
    • ensure that the message of the final single commit is descriptive and prefixed with either feat: or fix: , others might be used in rare occasions as well, if there is no need to document the changes in the release notes. The changes or fixes should be described in detail in the commit message for the changelog & release notes.
  • Testing
    • Changes, removals and additions to functionality must be covered by acceptance / integration tests or smoke tests - either already existing ones, or new ones, created by the author of the PR.

Pull Request Review

All pull requests must undergo a thorough review process before being merged.
The review process of the code PR should include code review, testing, and any necessary feedback or revisions.
Pull request reviews of functionality developed in other teams only review the given documentation and test reports.

Manual testing will not be performed by the reviewing team, and is the responsibility of the author of the PR.

For Node projects: It’s important to make sure changes in package.json are also affecting package-lock.json correctly.

If a dependency is not necessary, don’t add it.

When adding a new package as a dependency, make sure that the change is absolutely necessary. We would like to refrain from adding new dependencies when possible.
Documentation PRs in gitbook are reviewed by Snyk's content team. They will also advise on the best phrasing and structuring if needed.

Pull Request Approval

Once a pull request has been reviewed and all necessary revisions have been made, it is approved for merging into
the main codebase. The merging of the code PR is performed by the code owners, the merging of the documentation PR
by our content writers.

What does this PR do?

This PR fixes an issue when running snyk auth when there is a token stored that is not valid. Originally auth used to fail in this case, now it ignores any stored token when running auth.

Where should the reviewer start?

The main changes are in this GAF PR

How should this be manually tested?

Before the changes in this PR, running the following will fail snyk auth

snyk config set api=invalid
snyk auth

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

HEAD-1197

Screenshots

Additional questions

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2024 15:56
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2024 15:56
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer enabled auto-merge (squash) January 17, 2024 08:48
@thisislawatts
Copy link
Member

✨ Looks good to me


jest.setTimeout(1000 * 30);

function getFirstIPv4Address(): string {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

praise: Great to bring this out to a reusable location.

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer merged commit 2890b46 into master Jan 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer deleted the fix/HEAD-1197_reauth branch January 17, 2024 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants