Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

App Clean-Up June 2022 #28

Closed
jaxoncreed opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

App Clean-Up June 2022 #28

jaxoncreed opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@jaxoncreed
Copy link
Contributor

Hi All,

As discussed in the last Solid team meeting, I'm cleaning up the Solid App (https://solidproject.org/apps) page.

I've created notes for each app listed here (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p0opUBL0vRpEdNzDuB8mVy5XTrAbhSdMIzytqn-ef-M/edit?usp=sharing), and I've reached out to each of the developers to alert them of their app's status.

Apps were evaluated based on the criteria listed at the bottom of the apps page (https://solidproject.org/apps). The criteria for an app to be Solid-compatible are:

  1. If identifying users is necessary, they must be able to login using their WebID and pointing to the Identity Provider of their choice
  2. Data consumed by the app should be fetched from Solid Pods if possible
  3. Data generated by the app should be stored in Solid Pods
  4. The interaction between the app, pods, and Identity Provider(s) must be compliant with the Solid specification

Based on this, I sorted the apps into 4 categories:

Super Feature
Super Featured apps will be listed at the top of the "Featured" category. Each of these apps is compatible with both the Old authentication standard, the new authentication standard, and the new-new (2022) authentication standard. Developers of super featured apps received the following in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, is fantastic and I’m going to move it into the featured section.

Feature
Featured apps were compatible with at least one authentication standard but not all, and they had a usable UI that would give a decent first-impression for people exploring Solid for the first time. Developers of featured apps received the following in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, may not work on the most recent version of Solid's auth. Upgrading to https://www.npmjs.com/package/@inrupt/solid-client-authn-browser should make it compatible, and you can test to see if it works by logging into the next-gen community server at https://solidweb.me.

Keep
Apps labeled keep were compatible with at least one authentication standard but not all. Developers of "keep" apps received the following in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, may not work on the most recent version of Solid's auth. Upgrading to https://www.npmjs.com/package/@inrupt/solid-client-authn-browser should make it compatible, and you can test to see if it works by logging into the next-gen community server at https://solidweb.me.

Remove
Apps marked as "Remove" either failed to meet the criteria listed on the apps site in some way or the criteria was un-testable. There were a few standard reasons for this, and I was sure to stress that the decision could be disputed before the page was updated.

Some apps didn't have an option to log in with other Solid servers and forced users into a specific server, thus violating rule 1. Developers received this message in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, may be Solid compatible, but there is no option to log into other Solid compatible Pods, so I’m planning on removing it from the list. You can always reach out to me and tell me if I’m wrong in that assessment. I’ll be happy to add it back.

Some apps encountered errors when testing that prevented me from testing rules 2-4. Developers received this message in their email:

In my testing, your app, {App Name}, encountered some problems that prevented me from being able to use it. {Describe the Error} I am planning on removing it from the list. You can always fix the problem or let me know if I’m incorrect. I’ll be glad to add them back.

Some apps were not Solid-Specific apps. They may have been linked-data related but lacked the ability to work with a Solid Pod. Alternatively, a few were simply landing pages for an organization and not apps. Developers received this message in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, doesn’t look like it’s a Solid-specific app, so I’m planning on removing it from the list. You can always reach out to me and tell me if I’m wrong in that assessment. I’ll be happy to add it back.

Some apps were not able to authenticate with any Solid server. Developers received this message in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, encountered an error while authenticating with any Solid server, including legacy ones, so I’m planning on removing it from the list. You can always fix the problem or let me know if I’m incorrect. I’ll be glad to add them back.

Some apps linked to sites that did not load. Developers received this in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, doesn’t seem to load, so I’m planning on removing it from the list. You can always fix the problem or let me know if I’m incorrect. I’ll be glad to add them back.

Some apps did not have a deployed instance and required a user to clone a git repository and host the app locally. This prevented the app from being tested. Though, this criteria was appealed and instead of removing these apps, I'll now add them to a new section called "Self-Installed." Developers received this in their email:

Your app, {App Name}, doesn’t have a deployed instance, so I’m planning on removing it from the list. You can always create a deployed instance and contact me, and I’ll be glad to add them back.

@jaxoncreed
Copy link
Contributor Author

The following is the current standings for the App Update. I will leave this up for two weeks for comment, then make a pull request to update the document:

Super Feature:

Feature:

Keep:

Self-Install Category

Remove

@jaxoncreed
Copy link
Contributor Author

The new apps were merged in with #727

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant