api: add a standard -dump-requests flag #266
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This flag dumps the request and response out to stdout for any request issued via the internal/api package. This is probably only useful to people developing src-cli, but it's also pretty lightweight.
mrnugget
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2020
scjohns
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2023
This flag dumps the request and response out to stdout for any request issued via the internal/api package. This is probably only useful to people developing src-cli, but it's also pretty lightweight.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This flag dumps the request and response out to stdout for any request issued via the internal/api package. This is probably only useful to people developing src-cli, but it's also pretty lightweight.
The output is very basic right now, but that's mostly because we have lots of implementation details stuck unexported in
cmd/srcthat would be useful for colouring. If we land this and #268, then I'll likely rework this to use the newOutputtype.