Skip to content

Conversation

@sourcery-ai-experiments-bot

No description provided.

@sourcery-ai-experiments-bot
Copy link
Author

This is a benchmark review for experiment review_of_reviews_20240508.
Run ID: review_of_reviews_20240508/benchmark_2024-05-08T00-14-14_v1-16-0-252-g323437959.

This pull request was cloned from https://github.com/NathanVaughn/blog.nathanv.me/pull/200. (Note: the URL is not a link to avoid triggering a notification on the original pull request.)

Experiment configuration
review_config:
  # User configuration for the review
  # - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
  # - <value> - use the value directly
  user_config:
    enable_ai_review: true
    enable_rule_comments: false

    enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
    enable_docstring_comments: benchmark
    enable_security_comments: benchmark
    enable_tests_comments: benchmark
    enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
    enable_functionality_review: benchmark

    enable_approvals: true

  ai_review_config:
    # The model responses to use for the experiment
    # - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
    # - llm - call the language model to generate responses
    model_responses:
      comments_model: benchmark
      comment_validation_model: benchmark
      comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
      complexity_model: benchmark
      docstrings_model: benchmark
      functionality_model: benchmark
      security_model: benchmark
      tests_model: benchmark

# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/nbhirud/system_update/pull/31
- https://github.com/nbhirud/system_update/pull/34
- https://github.com/suttacentral/suttacentral/pull/3164
- https://github.com/0xdade/sephiroth/pull/79
- https://github.com/Fenigor/align-game/pull/3
- https://github.com/NathanVaughn/blog.nathanv.me/pull/200
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/107
- https://github.com/Stagietechs/sketchup-ruby-api-tutorials/pull/1
- https://github.com/jabesq-org/pyatmo/pull/497
- https://github.com/UnitapApp/unitap-backend/pull/440
- https://github.com/UnitapApp/unitap-backend/pull/441
- https://github.com/UnitapApp/unitap-backend/pull/442
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2725
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/305
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/309
- https://github.com/kloudlite/operator/pull/185
- https://github.com/kloudlite/api/pull/317
- https://github.com/nuxeo/nuxeo-drive/pull/4850
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1711
- https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/pull/5303
- https://github.com/Cristofer543/Cristofer543.github.io/pull/1
- https://github.com/W-zrd/unishare_mobile/pull/14
- https://github.com/2lambda123/DPDK-dpdk/pull/3
- https://github.com/2lambda123/DPDK-dpdk/pull/1
- https://github.com/2lambda123/wayveai-mile/pull/1
- https://github.com/2lambda123/wayveai-mile/pull/3
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5188
- https://github.com/Patrick-Ehimen/the-wild-oasis/pull/1
- https://github.com/Patrick-Ehimen/the-wild-oasis/pull/2
- https://github.com/manoelhc/test-actions/pull/41
- https://github.com/StartupOS/verinfast/pull/365
- https://github.com/CypherGuy/PantryPal/pull/1
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/devcycle-docs/pull/666
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/cli/pull/388
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/js-sdks/pull/841
- https://github.com/allthingslinux/tux/pull/207
- https://github.com/simnova/ownercommunity/pull/109
- https://github.com/simnova/ownercommunity/pull/111
- https://github.com/simnova/ownercommunity/pull/112
- https://github.com/FrancisKOUAHO/Plumera/pull/24
- https://github.com/FrancisKOUAHO/Plumera/pull/25
- https://github.com/dashmug/glue-utils/pull/32
- https://github.com/dashmug/glue-utils/pull/34
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
  question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
  question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
  question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
  question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
  question: |
    What type of LLM test could this comment become?
    - 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
    - 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
    - no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test

# Benchmark reviews generated by running
#   python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []

Copy link

@SourceryAI SourceryAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good

LangSmith trace

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Comment on lines +3 to +4
{{ $image_original := .Page.Resources.Get (.Get "src") }}
{{ $image := $image_original }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Consider renaming $image_original to a more descriptive variable name.

The variable $image_original could be named to reflect its purpose more clearly, such as $original_image, to enhance readability and maintainability.

Suggested change
{{ $image_original := .Page.Resources.Get (.Get "src") }}
{{ $image := $image_original }}
{{ $original_image := .Page.Resources.Get (.Get "src") }}
{{ $image := $original_image }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment helpful?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the comment type correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the comment area correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What type of LLM test could this comment become?

  • 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
  • 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
  • no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test

Comment on lines +2 to +8
author: Nathan Vaughn
date: "2024-05-06"
description: Let's talk about domain names
tags:
- DNS
- domains
title: "Domains"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Review the consistency of metadata fields across other posts for uniformity.

Check if the metadata fields like 'author', 'date', and 'tags' are consistently used in the same format across other blog posts to maintain a uniform appearance and metadata structure.

Suggested change
author: Nathan Vaughn
date: "2024-05-06"
description: Let's talk about domain names
tags:
- DNS
- domains
title: "Domains"
---
author: Nathan Vaughn
date: 2024-05-06
description: Let's talk about domain names
tags:
- DNS
- domains
title: Domains
---

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment helpful?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the comment type correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the comment area correct?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What type of LLM test could this comment become?

  • 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
  • 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
  • no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants