Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - hare: restore passive hare participation #4028

Closed

Conversation

countvonzero
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

in #3971 codepath for passive hare participants is inadvertently disabled when vrf is not available (a non-smeshing node).

Changes

continue with hare protocol even if vrf nonce is not present

@countvonzero
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors merge

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
## Motivation
<!-- Please mention the issue fixed by this PR or detailed motivation -->
in #3971 codepath for passive hare participants is inadvertently disabled when vrf is not available (a non-smeshing node).

## Changes
<!-- Please describe in detail the changes made -->
continue with hare protocol even if vrf nonce is not present
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 1, 2023

Build failed:

@countvonzero
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors merge

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
## Motivation
<!-- Please mention the issue fixed by this PR or detailed motivation -->
in #3971 codepath for passive hare participants is inadvertently disabled when vrf is not available (a non-smeshing node).

## Changes
<!-- Please describe in detail the changes made -->
continue with hare protocol even if vrf nonce is not present
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 1, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into develop.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title hare: restore passive hare participation [Merged by Bors] - hare: restore passive hare participation Feb 1, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Feb 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants