New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDF Facet Objects Ranges Queries #28

Open
agazzarini opened this Issue Feb 1, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Mar 11, 2015

Collaborator

Facet fields have been implemented but while developing things for issue #34 I met some mistakes

Collaborator

agazzarini commented Mar 11, 2015

Facet fields have been implemented but while developing things for issue #34 I met some mistakes

@agazzarini agazzarini referenced this issue Mar 16, 2015

Closed

rows & start #34

@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Mar 17, 2015

Collaborator

Facet fields have been correctly implemented with fixes committed for issue #34.
Next Step: facet queries

Collaborator

agazzarini commented Mar 17, 2015

Facet fields have been correctly implemented with fixes committed for issue #34.
Next Step: facet queries

@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Mar 22, 2015

Collaborator

Facet queries work only with Solr default query parser. Instead, using {!sparql} always results in 0 counts.

Collaborator

agazzarini commented Mar 22, 2015

Facet queries work only with Solr default query parser. Instead, using {!sparql} always results in 0 counts.

@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Mar 27, 2015

Collaborator

A first draft of facet range queries has been pushed out. It is still in r_rdf_faceting branch because it is not completed. However, strictly "facet ranges" are not supported: instead, we have "facet range queries", where one can facet by using a query (evaluated by a default solr query parser) that selects literals (numerics and dates) and applies facet ranges on top of them. More info on Wiki soon

Collaborator

agazzarini commented Mar 27, 2015

A first draft of facet range queries has been pushed out. It is still in r_rdf_faceting branch because it is not completed. However, strictly "facet ranges" are not supported: instead, we have "facet range queries", where one can facet by using a query (evaluated by a default solr query parser) that selects literals (numerics and dates) and applies facet ranges on top of them. More info on Wiki soon

@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Mar 31, 2015

Collaborator

The functionality has been implemented but not yet commited.

Being able to support aliased and non-aliased facet range queries, i had to introduced a query syntax with parameters for allowing a user to do thjngs like this

facet.range.q.1=p:<#xyz>
&facet.range.q.alias.1=xyz
&facet.range.q.2=+p:<#abc> -s:<yyy>
&facet.range.q.alias.2=foo
Collaborator

agazzarini commented Mar 31, 2015

The functionality has been implemented but not yet commited.

Being able to support aliased and non-aliased facet range queries, i had to introduced a query syntax with parameters for allowing a user to do thjngs like this

facet.range.q.1=p:<#xyz>
&facet.range.q.alias.1=xyz
&facet.range.q.2=+p:<#abc> -s:<yyy>
&facet.range.q.alias.2=foo

agazzarini pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2015

@agazzarini agazzarini changed the title from RDF Faceting to RDF Facet Fields Ranges Apr 3, 2015

@agazzarini agazzarini changed the title from RDF Facet Fields Ranges to RDF Facet Objects Ranges Queries Apr 5, 2015

@agazzarini

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@agazzarini

agazzarini Apr 5, 2015

Collaborator

A stable version of this feature has been implemented and merged in master. Missing points are

  • local params
  • integration tests
  • better coverage of unit tests
Collaborator

agazzarini commented Apr 5, 2015

A stable version of this feature has been implemented and merged in master. Missing points are

  • local params
  • integration tests
  • better coverage of unit tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment