Drop own Converters and use ReactiveAdapterRegistry directly where possible [DATACMNS-949]

[spring-projects-issues]

Mark Paluch opened DATACMNS-949 and commented

Currently, we take an indirection via Converter for reactive type adoption that requires registration of own converters. Reactive types of the same multiplicity (Flux to Observable/Flowable or Single to Mono) could be adopted by using ReactiveAdapterRegistry directly. Using ReactiveAdapterRegistry without ConversionService introduces a dependency to Publisher which only matters if pure RxJava 1 is used - Project Reactor and RxJava 2 are based on Reactive Streams.

---

Affects: 2.0 M1 (Kay)

Issue Links:

• DATACMNS-947 Adopt ReactiveTypeDescriptor changes

• DATACMNS-1508 Add support for Coroutines repositories

[spring-projects-issues]

Mark Paluch commented

Will be handled in the context of DATACMNS-1508. We should reuse ReactiveAdapterRegistry if we can instead of being required to register new wrapper types