Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DATAMONGO-2390 - Add support for maxTimeMS to AggregationOptions. #800

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

maxTimeMS defines the time limit for the aggregation operation. If not specified or set to zero, operations will not time out.

Execution time and test order changed by using JUnit5. This commit fixes some of the issues related to index creation where actually not needed.
maxTimeMs defines the time limit for the aggregation operations. If not specified or set to zero, operations will not time out.
Switch touched test files to JUnit Jupiter.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
maxTimeMs defines the time limit for the aggregation operations. If not specified or set to zero, operations will not time out.

Original pull request: #800.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
Switch touched test files to JUnit Jupiter.

Original pull request: #800.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
Reformat code.

Original pull request: #800.
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Oct 28, 2019

That's merged and polished now.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Oct 28, 2019
@mp911de mp911de deleted the issue/DATAMONGO-2390 branch October 28, 2019 09:24
@michalztk
Copy link

Hi. When will you publish this issue in the official spring version?

@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Dec 13, 2019

Please follow our release wiki for the release schedule.

@michalztk
Copy link

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants