Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content negotiation improvements [SPR-8410] #13057

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Jun 7, 2011 · 0 comments
Closed

Content negotiation improvements [SPR-8410] #13057

spring-projects-issues opened this issue Jun 7, 2011 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

spring-projects-issues commented Jun 7, 2011

Rossen Stoyanchev opened SPR-8410 and commented

The ContentNegotiatingViewResolver provides a range of options for configuring content negotiation based on the 'Accept' header, by path extension, or by request parameter. However when writing to the response via @ResponseBody only the 'Accept' header is used (see #12175). Furthermore, it's not possible to combine all options in the request mapping of a single method (see #11163, #12378).

This is an umbrella ticket to improve how content negotiation options are configured and to equalize the choices throughout request mappings, @ResponseBody methods, and ContentNegotiatingViewResolver.


Affects: 3.1 M1

Sub-tasks:

Issue Links:

6 votes, 9 watchers

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added type: enhancement A general enhancement in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) labels Jan 11, 2019
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added this to the 3.2 M2 milestone Jan 11, 2019
This was referenced Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants