Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document functional configuration style [SPR-15049] #19615

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Dec 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Document functional configuration style [SPR-15049] #19615

spring-projects-issues opened this issue Dec 23, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Dec 23, 2016

Juergen Hoeller opened SPR-15049 and commented

We need to properly document our functional configuration style and other functional-style facilities in Spring 5.


Issue Links:

  • #19398 Add a functional way to register a bean
  • #19614 Kotlin extension for GenericApplicationContext with registerBean(KClass) variants
  • #19763 Data binding with immutable objects (Kotlin / Lombok / @ConstructorProperties)
  • #19719 Reference documentation for Groovy bean definition DSL
  • #22171 Refactor core documentation to make it relevant for modern Spring applications
@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Oct 4, 2018

Sébastien Deleuze commented

I am wondering if that could be possible to refactor our documentation to avoid the functional API documentation being lost in the existing XML and JavaConfig stuff with something organized like:

  • Section about what is common to XML, JavaConfig and functional beans
  • Section specific to XML
  • Section specific to JavaConfig
  • Section specific to functional beans
@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented Jan 7, 2019

Sébastien Deleuze commented

I have created #22171 which is about what I proposed in the previous comment.

@sdeleuze
Copy link
Contributor

@sdeleuze sdeleuze commented Oct 25, 2020

Duplicate of #25773.

@sdeleuze sdeleuze closed this Oct 25, 2020
@sdeleuze sdeleuze removed this from the 5.3 GA milestone Oct 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.