Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SEC-1737: Provide JPA-based UserDetailsService & UserDetailsManager abstract implementations #1973

spring-projects-issues opened this issue May 10, 2011 · 2 comments


Copy link

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented May 10, 2011

Matthew T. Adams (Migrated from SEC-1737) said:

Sometimes it's handy to have a JPA-based UserDetailsService or UserDetailsManager instead of a JDBC-based one. The attached classes are abstract classes that do the boilerplate work of the UserDetailsService & UserDetailsManager implementation, defining abstract methods for subclasses to implement for the user's specific entities that represent users & groups.

Contributing since I considered it helpful, and I figured others might like to have it. It does introduce a dependency on JPA, so should probably go into some kind of separate contrib module outside of core.

Hope you likey.

Copy link

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues commented May 10, 2011

Matthew T. Adams said:

Just noticed should probably be in the package to align with JdbcUserDetailsManager.


Copy link

@rwinch rwinch commented May 25, 2021

Thank you for the report. We are not going to provide additional implementations of UserDetaisService as it will get difficult to maintain. Additionally, we are unlikely to provide all the attributes users want, so they will likely need to provide their own. Finally, it is easy enough for user's to provide their own implementation. For these reasons, I'm closing this as declined.


@rwinch rwinch closed this May 25, 2021
@rwinch rwinch self-assigned this May 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants