SEC-1743: Separate remoting module from core #1979

spring-issuemaster opened this Issue May 12, 2011 · 0 comments

1 participant


Luke Taylor (Migrated from SEC-1743) said:

The remoting code introduces several dependencies which core would not otherwise need. Most apps do not use remoting, so the code should be place in a separate module.

@spring-issuemaster spring-issuemaster added this to the 3.1.0.RC3 milestone Feb 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment