Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added more info to the section on Bindings #54

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
6 participants
Contributor

veebs commented Apr 13, 2011

"Binding Transforms" and "Manually Creating and Disconnecting Bindings" sections copied from wiki, reviewed and reformatted for guides.

Contributor

wagenet commented Apr 18, 2011

I think these changes are a good idea, but I wonder if we shouldn't add a separate guide for them. Special Binding types seems beyond the realm of "core" concepts.

Contributor

veebs commented Apr 18, 2011

Would you like me to create a new section under "Core Concepts" called "Advance Concepts" and move my changes there?

Contributor

wagenet commented Apr 18, 2011

That's one option. The other option is to do a more detailed section on Bindings, maybe even moving some of the stuff in Core Concepts there. I think I'm leaning more towards that one. Maybe you should start a thread on the dev mailing list (http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore-dev).

Contributor

veebs commented Apr 26, 2011

Hi Peter,

There's been a lot of discussion more on the Run Loop than advance bindings.

Should I proceed with making changes for the "Run Time" section (as per below)?

Guides

  • Start Here
    • Install
    • Getting Started with HTML-Based Apps
    • Getting Started
    • Core Concepts
  • Runtime
    • Objects
    • Observers
    • Bindings
    • Errors
  • Models
  • Views
  • etc....

Should I leave the Run Loop as is in Core Concepts until the community decides what to do with it?

Contributor

wagenet commented Apr 26, 2011

@veebs, we're planning some more reorganizations of the guides but I definitely do want to get your work in. For now, sit tight and we'll let you know ASAP what we end up deciding on. Thanks again!

Contributor

topherfangio commented May 31, 2013

So...thoughts on what we should do now?

I should have some time to make it happen and get this merged in :-)

Owner

dcporter commented Jul 17, 2013

I actually support this going directly into this guide as is. The line about SC.Binding.oneWay is a crucial early (if not quite core) concept; by the rubric of how soon as a beginner I started making productive use of them, binding transformations land in the same boat. Thoughts all?

Owner

mauritslamers commented Jul 17, 2013

Agreed, binding transforms are very important, and while in essence oneWay is an optimization, it is also an added security.

Op 17 jul 2013, om 21:11 heeft Dave Porter het volgende geschreven:

I actually support this going directly into this guide as is. The line about SC.Binding.oneWay is a crucial early (if not quite core) concept; by the rubric of how soon as a beginner I started making productive use of them, binding transformations land in the same boat. Thoughts all?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Owner

publickeating commented Jul 17, 2013

Go for it @topherfangio if you're still available.

Contributor

topherfangio commented Jul 17, 2013

I'll get this added.

Thanks!

Topher Fangio

System Architect
Pharos Resources

office: 325.216.2908
mobile: 325.660.7141

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Tyler Keating notifications@github.comwrote:

Go for it @topherfangio https://github.com/topherfangio if you're still
available.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sproutcore/guides/pull/54#issuecomment-21137761
.

Contributor

topherfangio commented Jul 19, 2013

Merged in 375589a, not sure why it didn't auto-close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment