add schema name when "Drag and Drop Qualified Names" for fields of atacched tables

[n-arakawa]

Describe the new feature

I recently notice the "Drag and Drop Qualified Names" from DB schema is implemented.
Thanks!

It is more convenient to add a schema name for attached database!

Additional info

Please answer these questions before submitting your feature request.

Is your feature request related to an issue? Please include the issue number.

Does this feature exist in another product or project? Please provide a link.

Do you have a screenshot? Please add screenshots to help explain your idea.

[mgrojo]

I considered including also the schema in field names (except for main). Finally I felt that it was too verbose and left only the table name when the qualified option is enabled. But no strong opinion with that, it can be changed. I wonder now if we need an additional option for this or people will be satisfied with selecting between fully qualified and not qualified at all.

By the way, with the current version, you can control-select the schema and the field to get the fully qualified name.

[n-arakawa]

By the way, with the current version, you can control-select the schema and the field to get the fully qualified name.

To have a good result, it is important to disable qualified option and click items in right order.
(schema -> table -> field)

I wonder now if we need an additional option for this or people will be satisfied with selecting between fully qualified and not qualified at all.

It is not so tedious to delete unnecessary qualifier. So I prefer just two options:

• just simple, or
• fully qualified

[mgrojo]

Ok, qualified means qualified after all. I've added the domain as you suggested.

[n-arakawa]

Thanks!
I can get <schema>.<table>.<fileld> when drag and drop a field with 'fully qualified' option on.

commit 9daf265
Version 3.10.99 (Sep 15 2018)
Qt Version 5.9.5
SQLCipher Version 3.4.1 (based on SQLite 3.15.2)

[mgrojo]

Thanks for testing, @n-arakawa. Let's close this, then.

By the way I had to edit your comment to understand. At first, the text between <> did not show up, and I thought it was failing for you 😄