From 8f452f6228a78feb03ab96c3863400cf10d9b4ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aise Johan de Jong Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:33:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add remark on boundedness perfect complexes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks to Nicolás https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/08CM#comment-8373 --- cohomology.tex | 5 +++++ sites-cohomology.tex | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/cohomology.tex b/cohomology.tex index ff8cb713..02cd3318 100644 --- a/cohomology.tex +++ b/cohomology.tex @@ -12482,6 +12482,11 @@ \section{Perfect complexes} if it can be represented by a perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. \end{definition} +\noindent +If $X$ is quasi-compact, then a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ +is in $D^b(\mathcal{O}_X)$. But this need not be the case if +$X$ is not quasi-compact. + \begin{lemma} \label{lemma-perfect-independent-representative} Let $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ be a ringed space. diff --git a/sites-cohomology.tex b/sites-cohomology.tex index b9385a54..a728043f 100644 --- a/sites-cohomology.tex +++ b/sites-cohomology.tex @@ -12707,6 +12707,12 @@ \section{Perfect complexes} if it can be represented by a perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. \end{definition} +\noindent +If $\Sh(\mathcal{C})$ is quasi-compact +(Sites, Section \ref{sites-section-quasi-compact}), +then a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O})$ +is in $D^b(\mathcal{O})$. But this need not be the case otherwise. + \begin{lemma} \label{lemma-perfect-independent-representative} Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site.