New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
allow using student_t instead of gaussian for likelihood #35
Comments
We're going to also need a prior on the degrees of freedom. Aki suggested gamma with shape 2 and rate 0.1 |
@bgoodri Do you think the approach in my initial comment is preferable to implementing the student_t likelihood the same way we do the others? Might it be more efficient to not estimate all N of the V_i terms and instead just use |
Yeah, although we would have to create a family object for the t On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jonah Gabry notifications@github.com
|
…ictions Feature dynamic predictions
Hi All - just wondering if adding a Student's t distribution for likelihood is still being considered? Or was this effort conclusively discontinued? |
We certainly haven't ruled out including it; we just haven't included it
yet.
…On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:09 PM Matt Maciejewski ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi All - just wondering if adding a Student's t distribution for
likelihood is still being considered? Or was this effort conclusively
discontinued?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#35?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAZ2XKR2YGCFFDDXLO47O5DRCQ3PNA5CNFSM4BT3X7YKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOELRZLEQ#issuecomment-585340306>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZ2XKQIUY6NAPDWKT4YSTLRCQ3PNANCNFSM4BT3X7YA>
.
|
For
stan_glm
with a suitable outcome (and maybestan_lmer
), we should provide an option to use the t distribution as the likelihood instead of a Gaussian.Perhaps we just follow BDA3 17.2 and use the fact that
y_i ~ t_v(m, s^2)
is equivalent to
y_i | V_i ~ N(m, V_i)
V_i ~ scaled-inv-chi-sq(v, s^2)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: