Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obnoxious naming #99

Closed
hikari-no-yume opened this issue Apr 2, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@hikari-no-yume
Copy link

commented Apr 2, 2015

"JS Standard" would imply that it's actually standardised. It isn't, it's an arbitrary coding style guide with no official endorsement.

@feross

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Apr 2, 2015

Thanks for sharing your opinion :)

Those of us who use standard find it helps hold our code to a high standard of quality and ensures that new contributors follow our module's style standards.

@feross feross closed this Apr 2, 2015

@standard standard locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 2, 2015

@maxogden

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 2, 2015

@feross im gonna put that in the readme :)

@maxogden

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Apr 2, 2015

@TazeTSchnitzel Thanks for the feedback. You can find our clarified intent of use of the word 'standard' here: https://github.com/feross/standard/blob/master/README.md#one-style-to-rule-them-all

@dcousens dcousens added the i disagree label Jan 11, 2016

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.