Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: arimax forecast should special case k_ar == 0 #1858

Closed
jseabold opened this issue Jul 31, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants

jseabold added a commit to jseabold/statsmodels that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2014

jseabold added a commit to jseabold/statsmodels that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2014

@jseabold jseabold closed this in 92a494a Aug 20, 2014

josef-pkt added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2014

Merge pull request #1859 from jseabold/arimax-forecast-bug
BUG: Don't use negative indexing with k_ar == 0. Closes #1858.

bert9bert added a commit to bert9bert/statsmodels that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2014

PierreBdR pushed a commit to PierreBdR/statsmodels that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2014

PierreBdR pushed a commit to PierreBdR/statsmodels that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2014

Merge pull request statsmodels#1859 from jseabold/arimax-forecast-bug
BUG: Don't use negative indexing with k_ar == 0. Closes statsmodels#1858.

@josef-pkt josef-pkt added this to the 0.6 milestone Feb 17, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.