Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: GEE subclasses NominalGEE don't work with pandas exog #1931

josef-pkt opened this issue Aug 22, 2014 · 1 comment


None yet
1 participant
Copy link

commented Aug 22, 2014

using pandas.DataFrame for endog and exog raises and exception in __init__ setup_nominal

ERROR: statsmodels.genmod.tests.test_gee.TestGEEMultinomialCovType.test_wrapper
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\programs\python27\lib\site-packages\nose-1.0.0-py2.7.egg\nose\", line 187, in runTest
  File "E:\Josef\eclipsegworkspace\statsmodels-git\statsmodels-all-new2_py27\statsmodels\statsmodels\genmod\tests\", line 968, in test_wrapper
  File "E:\Josef\eclipsegworkspace\statsmodels-git\statsmodels-all-new2_py27\statsmodels\statsmodels\genmod\", line 1692, in __init__
    exog, groups, time, offset)
  File "E:\Josef\eclipsegworkspace\statsmodels-git\statsmodels-all-new2_py27\statsmodels\statsmodels\genmod\", line 1742, in setup_nominal
    exog_out[jrow, :] = np.kron(u, exog_row)
ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (4) (2)

I'm in the middle of adding the wrappers and this is a test failure, but it looks unrelated to the wrappers.
I haven't tested outside of my branch. PR #1916

Both, OrdinalGEE and NominalGEE, call setup_xxx before doing the super call. The data is preprocessed, but there is no asarray in there.

OrdinalGEE has a set of `asarray in there and works without problems with pandas DataFrames

I don't know whether from_formula works, no test case, and I haven't tried an example yet.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Aug 22, 2014

Ok, copying the asarray from OrdinalGEE to NominalGEE fixes it.

@josef-pkt josef-pkt changed the title BUG: GEE subclasses OrdinalGEE, NominalGEE don't work with pandas exog BUG: GEE subclasses NominalGEE don't work with pandas exog Aug 22, 2014

@josef-pkt josef-pkt closed this in 3062a80 Aug 23, 2014

bert9bert added a commit to bert9bert/statsmodels that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2014

yarikoptic added a commit to yarikoptic/statsmodels that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2014

Merge commit 'v0.5.0-1269-g957a43e' into debian-experimental
* commit 'v0.5.0-1269-g957a43e': (59 commits)
  TST: avoid pandas in assert with wrapped results (failure pandas>0.12)
  REF: GEEResults rename to postfix names, keep old as alias for now
  BUG: NominalGEE pandas handling, fix typo, adjust unit tests
  ENH: GEE add Wrapper, closes statsmodels#1904
  BUG: NominalGEE fix initialization for pandas, closes statsmodels#1931
  BUG/ENH: add df_resid, df_model, fixes t_test, closes statsmodels#1918
  REF: GEE rename naive_covariance -> cov_naive, same for others
  REF: rename covariance_type -> cov_type
  TST: test_glm: remove test noise
  BUG: GEE subclasses cov_params_default doesn't get attached, unit tests
  REF: GEE summary remove covariance_type argument (not possible)
  BUG/TST: GEE fix predict closes statsmodels#1919 and fix conf_int for cov_params_default add GEE to generic test, and adjust those (missing _results, summary2)
  BUG: GEE partial cleanup of cov_type, see statsmodels#1906
  ENH: cov_kwds add generic 'scaling_factor' option to match Stata
  BUG: genmod links, CDFLink, probit deriv2 use approx_fprime (not complex)
  BUG: fix used hessian in sandwich_covariance, with GLM test cases
  REF: GLM change default scale in score_obs (tests pass, possibly wrong, see PR comment)
  REF/TST generic cov_type, TST compare GLM Logit, GLM OLS (this fails)
  REF/ENH: add get_robustcov_results generically to LikelihoodModel/Results    NegativeBinomial as test case, needs cleanup for code duplication.
  ENH: add cov_type to, with tests for family Poisson
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.