t_test, f_test, model.py for normal instead of t-distribution #50

Closed
wesm opened this Issue Aug 25, 2011 · 2 comments

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@wesm
Member
wesm commented Aug 25, 2011

Original Launchpad bug 647777: https://bugs.launchpad.net/statsmodels/+bug/647777
Reported by: josef-pktd (joep).

models.py LikelihoodModelResults

t_test assumes that test statistic is t-distributed. If we only look at the asymptotic normal distribution, then we don't need df_residual.

Currently mainly a thought that needs checking.

model.py provides most of the generic methods that can be used with MLE models that are based on the asymptotic normal distribution.
see also SAS new proc PLM

essentially only params and cov_params are needed for the normal approximation.

I haven't thought yet about the dof in f_test (number of restriction is ok, but I don't know if we need df_resid.

conf_int is already overwritten by some subclasses to use the normal instead of t-distribution

@josef-pkt
Member

ContrastResults only handles t and F distribution, not normal and chisquare for Wald test (with asymptotic normality of params).

@josef-pkt
Member

this was added in PR #1189

@josef-pkt josef-pkt closed this May 22, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment