Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: numerical precision in resid_pearson with perfect fit #1229 #1230

Merged

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

commented Dec 13, 2013

supersedes #1227

see #1229 numerical precision of resid with perfect fit

@josef-pkt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Dec 13, 2013

@jseabold new version is here

I use eps of wresid.dtype, and add 10* as margin, but use mean() instead of any()

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Dec 13, 2013

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 99cf5fc on josef-pkt:regression_resid_person_zero into * on statsmodels:master*.

josef-pkt added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2013

Merge pull request #1230 from josef-pkt/regression_resid_person_zero
BUG: numerical precision in resid_pearson with perfect fit closes #1229

@josef-pkt josef-pkt merged commit a3d7835 into statsmodels:master Dec 15, 2013

1 check passed

default The Travis CI build passed
Details

@josef-pkt josef-pkt deleted the josef-pkt:regression_resid_person_zero branch Dec 16, 2013

PierreBdR pushed a commit to PierreBdR/statsmodels that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2014

Merge pull request statsmodels#1230 from josef-pkt/regression_resid_p…
…erson_zero

BUG: numerical precision in resid_pearson with perfect fit closes statsmodels#1229
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.