License issue with included files

[neeraj9]

I notice that you have moved to LGPL, which is a good news for me but I notice that you have included sources which are having GPLv2 and GPLv3 licenses. Are you planning to remove those to cleanup the license conflict?

[stefanocasazza]

Hi,

I am not sure to understand, you may be point to miniLZO for GPLv2 but I
don't see which is GPLv3.
I am not an expert of license conflict , can you suggest some more details
about and eventually a resolution...?

Greetings

2015-06-04 12:39 GMT+02:00 Neeraj notifications@github.com:

I notice that you have moved to LGPL, which is a good news for me but I
notice that you have included sources which are having GPLv2 and GPLv3
licenses. Are you planning to remove those to cleanup the license conflict?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9.

[neeraj9]

A quick rundown shows the following:

./tests/ulib/test_bison.* are under GPLv3.
./include/ulib/replace/strstream.h is under GPLv3.
./src/ulib/replace/strndup.c is under GPLv2
./tests/examples/benchmark/docroot/README.txt still indicates GPLv2 when you have moved to LGPLv3.
./src/ulib/base/lzo/* is GPLv2
./include/ulib/base/lzo/* is GPLv2
./include/ulib/flex/bison.skl is under GPLv2.

[neeraj9]

1. I think strndup and strstream can be easily removed though its probably added for certain platforms where these arent available.
2. tests for bison should carry a readme indicating the license if at all you want to keep those and also add a reference to those somewhere in root path of your project.
3. lzo needs to go and should be replaced with an equivalent LGPL or another liberal license.

[stefanocasazza]

Hi,

ok, I tried to clean the issue, and I commit the change to the repository...

About miniLZO I find this alternative:
https://code.google.com/p/miniz/

What do you think?

Greetings

2015-06-04 13:44 GMT+02:00 Neeraj notifications@github.com:

1. I think strndup and strstream can be easily removed though its
   probably added for certain platforms where these arent available.
2. tests for bison should carry a readme indicating the license if at
   all you want to keep those and also add a reference to those somewhere in
   root path of your project.
3. lzo needs to go and should be replaced with an equivalent LGPL or
   another liberal license.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).

[neeraj9]

looks good

[stefanocasazza]

Hi,

ok, thank you...

Greetings

2015-07-06 10:17 GMT+02:00 Neeraj notifications@github.com:

looks good

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).