diff --git a/src/doc/book/error-handling.md b/src/doc/book/error-handling.md index 78527c21d1067..73875704ecaf7 100644 --- a/src/doc/book/error-handling.md +++ b/src/doc/book/error-handling.md @@ -356,11 +356,28 @@ fn file_name(file_path: &str) -> Option<&str> { ``` You might think that we could use the `map` combinator to reduce the case -analysis, but its type doesn't quite fit. Namely, `map` takes a function that -does something only with the inner value. The result of that function is then -*always* [rewrapped with `Some`](#code-option-map). Instead, we need something -like `map`, but which allows the caller to return another `Option`. Its generic -implementation is even simpler than `map`: +analysis, but its type doesn't quite fit... + +```rust,ignore +fn file_path_ext(file_path: &str) -> Option<&str> { + file_name(file_path).map(|x| extension(x)) //Compilation error +} +``` + +The `map` function here wraps the value returned by the `extension` function +inside an `Option<_>` and since the `extension` function itself returns an +`Option<&str>` the expression `file_name(file_path).map(|x| extension(x))` +actually returns an `Option>`. + +But since `file_path_ext` just returns `Option<&str>` (and not +`Option>`) we get a compilation error. + +The result of the function taken by map as input is *always* [rewrapped with +`Some`](#code-option-map). Instead, we need something like `map`, but which +allows the caller to return a `Option<_>` directly without wrapping it in +another `Option<_>`. + +Its generic implementation is even simpler than `map`: ```rust fn and_then(option: Option, f: F) -> Option @@ -382,6 +399,10 @@ fn file_path_ext(file_path: &str) -> Option<&str> { } ``` +Side note: Since `and_then` essentially works like `map` but returns an +`Option<_>` instead of an `Option>` it is known as `flatmap` in some +other languages. + The `Option` type has many other combinators [defined in the standard library][5]. It is a good idea to skim this list and familiarize yourself with what's available—they can often reduce case analysis