Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upnpmjs.org tells me that left-pad is not available (404 page) #4
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
tonytamps
Mar 22, 2016
according to https://registry.npmjs.org/left-pad
unpublished: {
name: "azer",
time: "2016-03-22T21:27:15.696Z",
...
}
It's causing Babel to fail installation
tonytamps
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
according to https://registry.npmjs.org/left-pad
It's causing Babel to fail installation |
silkentrance
changed the title from
npmjs.org tells me that left-pad is not available
to
npmjs.org tells me that left-pad is not available (404 page)
Mar 22, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
silkentrance
Mar 22, 2016
@tonytamps thanks for pointing this out
@azer why? this will break babel based builds on travis...
silkentrance
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@tonytamps thanks for pointing this out @azer why? this will break babel based builds on travis... |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Baggz
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
I'm having the same issue. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jagthedrummer
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Yep, I'm having the same problem. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Baggz
Mar 22, 2016
Seems like https://www.npmjs.com/package/left-pad is up again, but no versions published.
Baggz
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Seems like https://www.npmjs.com/package/left-pad is up again, but no versions published. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
OllieJennings
Mar 22, 2016
@tonytamps it seems like the registry has updated weirdly
{
"_id": "left-pad",
"_rev": "12-29db2b53680e1c66ee1acc89502fe1b0",
"name": "left-pad",
"time": {
"modified": "2016-03-22T21:42:18.002Z",
"created": "2014-03-14T09:09:20.762Z",
"0.0.0": "2014-03-14T09:09:20.762Z",
"0.0.1": "2014-08-14T03:31:03.146Z",
"0.0.2": "2014-08-15T07:13:09.056Z",
"0.0.3": "2014-08-15T07:14:44.360Z",
"0.0.4": "2015-05-20T04:04:04.473Z",
"1.0.0": "2016-03-22T21:42:18.002Z",
"unpublished": {
"name": "westlac",
"time": "2016-03-22T21:47:25.250Z",
"tags": {
"latest": "1.0.0"
},
OllieJennings
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@tonytamps it seems like the registry has updated weirdly
|
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
Yeah I published a 1.0.0 to try to resolve the dependency. It looks like someone (not me) completely removed left-pad from the npm registry
|
Yeah I published a 1.0.0 to try to resolve the dependency. It looks like someone (not me) completely removed left-pad from the npm registry |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jagthedrummer
Mar 22, 2016
Is there a way to get all the old versions back again? In my project it's at the end of a fairly long dependency chain...
jagthedrummer
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Is there a way to get all the old versions back again? In my project it's at the end of a fairly long dependency chain... |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
@azer would know better why it was unpublished (assuming he was the one to unpublish it)
|
@azer would know better why it was unpublished (assuming he was the one to unpublish it) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jmcriffey
Mar 22, 2016
@camwest The package line-numbers is pinned to 0.0.3 specifically, so you'll need to publish that version or someone will have to summon the creator of line-numbers.
jmcriffey
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@camwest The package |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
silkentrance
Mar 22, 2016
Just tried replacing the travis version of npm which is fairly old by a the latest and see what it will do
npm ERR! Linux 3.13.0-40-generic
npm ERR! argv "/home/travis/.nvm/versions/node/v4.2.2/bin/node" "/home/travis/.nvm/versions/node/v4.2.2/bin/npm" "install"
npm ERR! node v4.2.2
npm ERR! npm v3.8.2
npm ERR! No compatible version found: left-pad@0.0.3
npm ERR! Valid install targets:
npm ERR! 0.0.9
npm ERR!
npm ERR!
npm ERR! If you need help, you may report this error at:
npm ERR! <https://github.com/npm/npm/issues>
npm ERR! Please include the following file with any support request:
npm ERR! /home/travis/build/coldrye-es/pingo/npm-debug.log
make: *** [deps] Error 1
It will now tell me that there is a version 0.0.9... weird.
Will not try to install that one, though, with all the malware going around...
silkentrance
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Just tried replacing the travis version of npm which is fairly old by a the latest and see what it will do
It will now tell me that there is a version 0.0.9... weird. Will not try to install that one, though, with all the malware going around... |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
RongxinZhang
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
+1 same issue here. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
OllieJennings
Mar 22, 2016
@RongxinZhang try and use the new GitHub reactions instead of the old +1 :)
OllieJennings
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@RongxinZhang try and use the new GitHub reactions instead of the old +1 :) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
olih
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
+1 same issue |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
@jmcriffey I can't publish 0.0.3 because it's already been published and removed. NPM forbids publishing a version of the same library twice.
See npm/npm-registry-couchapp#148 for context
|
@jmcriffey I can't publish 0.0.3 because it's already been published and removed. NPM forbids publishing a version of the same library twice. See npm/npm-registry-couchapp#148 for context |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
silkentrance
Mar 22, 2016
@lydell is there a way to make line-numbers work again, perhaps an alternate package or by depending on left-pad@1.0.0 instead?
silkentrance
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@lydell is there a way to make line-numbers work again, perhaps an alternate package or by depending on left-pad@1.0.0 instead? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
danteoh
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
+1... this is messing things up for a lot of ppl. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
This pull request needs to be merged and line-numbers needs to be republished
|
This pull request needs to be merged and line-numbers needs to be republished |
artych
referenced this issue
Mar 22, 2016
Closed
Cannot npm install -g ember-cli due to left-pad dependecy update #5669
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
tomcat90
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
+1 Also broke my stuff |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
phamcharles
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Same |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
anauleau
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Same - broke my build |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
laurelnaiad
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
This kind of just broke the internet. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
vhmth
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
It broked our build. Halp pl0x. Demo video for investors needs deploy soon. :-) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
laurelnaiad
Mar 22, 2016
My build wants version 0.0.3 back or else it's going to hold me hostage. npm reports the only valid install target is 0.0.9
laurelnaiad
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
My build wants version 0.0.3 back or else it's going to hold me hostage. npm reports the only valid install target is 0.0.9 |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
yentsun
Mar 22, 2016
was about to deploy after weeks of work (to demonstrate to the client) and bam - this issue.
yentsun
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
was about to deploy after weeks of work (to demonstrate to the client) and bam - this issue. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jacksonrayhamilton
Mar 22, 2016
It looks like someone (not me) completely removed left-pad from the npm registry
Time to update your password / credentials?
jacksonrayhamilton
commented
Mar 22, 2016
Time to update your password / credentials? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jmcriffey
commented
Mar 22, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
@jacksonrayhamilton I'm not the original author. When it was removed from npm I just forked this repo and republished it.
|
@jacksonrayhamilton I'm not the original author. When it was removed from npm I just forked this repo and republished it. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Chatting in https://slack.babeljs.io #discussion fyi |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
camwest
Mar 22, 2016
Contributor
Emergency release of babel with line numbers dependency removed incoming soon...
|
Emergency release of babel with line numbers dependency removed incoming soon... |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
loganfsmyth
Mar 22, 2016
Yep, given that it's unclear when line-numbers will be updated, we're dropping the dependency from babel-code-frame for now until we have more time to resolve.
loganfsmyth
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
Yep, given that it's unclear when |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
paladox
commented
Mar 22, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
maxkostow
Mar 22, 2016
You can install from github by adding left-pad to your to your package.json.
"dependencies": {
"left-pad": "git://github.com/azer/left-pad.git#bff80e3ef0db0bfaba7698606c4f623433d14355"
}
maxkostow
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
You can install from github by adding left-pad to your to your "dependencies": {
"left-pad": "git://github.com/azer/left-pad.git#bff80e3ef0db0bfaba7698606c4f623433d14355"
} |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ccutch
Mar 22, 2016
I made a pull request to line-numbers that is using this as a dependency if you guys want to thumb that up so he sees it lydell/line-numbers#2 i believe @camwest made one too
ccutch
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
I made a pull request to line-numbers that is using this as a dependency if you guys want to thumb that up so he sees it lydell/line-numbers#2 i believe @camwest made one too |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
ccutch
commented
Mar 22, 2016
|
@loganfsmyth care to use lodash? https://lodash.com/docs#padStart |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
callmevlad
Mar 23, 2016
Is there a possibility that these packages could turn malicious, and everyone who relied on them is in big trouble after their next npm install?
😨
callmevlad
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
KoryNunn
Mar 23, 2016
@drewhamlett so any module installed in the normal sudo'd global way would be able to do anything. Another good reason to use nvm.
KoryNunn
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@drewhamlett so any module installed in the normal sudo'd global way would be able to do anything. Another good reason to use nvm. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
zerkms
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@tlrobinson 2 links to the PR were more than enough, really. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
SomeoneWeird
Mar 23, 2016
@drewhamlett doesn't stop it wiping out your home directory, including all your ssh keys etc (you have backups, right?)
SomeoneWeird
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@drewhamlett doesn't stop it wiping out your home directory, including all your ssh keys etc (you have backups, right?) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Lana-chan
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
No, let's post it again! Maybe it'll fix itself! |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jacksonrayhamilton
Mar 23, 2016
Here's a quick script to check if you depended on any of @azer's packages (tested with npm@2.14.7 and npm@3.7.3). If you find any, you should confirm they are still safe.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
curl https://gist.githubusercontent.com/azer/db27417ee84b5f34a6ea/raw/50ab7ef26dbde2d4ea52318a3590af78b2a21162/gistfile1.txt \
| sed 's/^\(.*\)$/ \1@/' \
> ~/suspicious-packages.txt \
&& npm ls \
| grep -f ~/suspicious-packages.txt
jacksonrayhamilton
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Here's a quick script to check if you depended on any of @azer's packages (tested with #!/usr/bin/env bash
curl https://gist.githubusercontent.com/azer/db27417ee84b5f34a6ea/raw/50ab7ef26dbde2d4ea52318a3590af78b2a21162/gistfile1.txt \
| sed 's/^\(.*\)$/ \1@/' \
> ~/suspicious-packages.txt \
&& npm ls \
| grep -f ~/suspicious-packages.txt |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
dolkensp
Mar 23, 2016
@tlrobinson The PR doesn't matter - npm is going to address this issue the same way they addressed long-file-paths in windows - "Not our problem, go away"
dolkensp
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@tlrobinson The PR doesn't matter - npm is going to address this issue the same way they addressed long-file-paths in windows - "Not our problem, go away" |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
orf
Mar 23, 2016
Didn't they address long file paths in Windows by releasing a flat node_modules structure? That's the exact pain-staking opposite of "Not our problem, go away".
orf
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Didn't they address long file paths in Windows by releasing a flat node_modules structure? That's the exact pain-staking opposite of "Not our problem, go away". |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
tlrobinson
Mar 23, 2016
List of number of packages depending on those unpublished by @azer: https://gist.github.com/tlrobinson/05d2354a71f5491d2f5a
tlrobinson
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
List of number of packages depending on those unpublished by @azer: https://gist.github.com/tlrobinson/05d2354a71f5491d2f5a |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
davidmason
Mar 23, 2016
Didn't really expect to spend the last hours of my day cleaning up after another's tantrum.
@aduth so you're happy to use someone's code that they shared with the world for free, and you feel that your investment of $0 entitles you to some standard of service?
davidmason
commented
Mar 23, 2016
@aduth so you're happy to use someone's code that they shared with the world for free, and you feel that your investment of $0 entitles you to some standard of service? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
drewhamlett
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@davidmason Oh here we go again. Thanks a bunch. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
deoxxa
Mar 23, 2016
If anyone is confused about @davidmason's comment, it was in reference to a now-deleted reply. Anyone who has email notifications turned on in this thread probably has a copy in their inbox.
deoxxa
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
If anyone is confused about @davidmason's comment, it was in reference to a now-deleted reply. Anyone who has email notifications turned on in this thread probably has a copy in their inbox. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
zombieJ
Mar 23, 2016
Open source should not be oppressed. Though it cost others time, you have the reason to do that.
zombieJ
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Open source should not be oppressed. Though it cost others time, you have the reason to do that. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
joeandaverde
Mar 23, 2016
@davidmason the suck it up, you didn't earn it, move on mentality contributes negatively to the validity and trustworthiness of the OSS community.
joeandaverde
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@davidmason the suck it up, you didn't earn it, move on mentality contributes negatively to the validity and trustworthiness of the OSS community. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
deoxxa
Mar 23, 2016
@joeandaverde the "you made it, you have to support the way I use it" mentality contributes negatively to the experience of being a part of the OSS community.
deoxxa
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@joeandaverde the "you made it, you have to support the way I use it" mentality contributes negatively to the experience of being a part of the OSS community. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
matthew-dean
Mar 23, 2016
Safe harbor just means that NPM is safe (somewhat) from prosecution even if someone hosts copyrighted works on NPM. It doesn't mean they don't have to act on behalf of trademark / copyright owners.
matthew-dean
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Safe harbor just means that NPM is safe (somewhat) from prosecution even if someone hosts copyrighted works on NPM. It doesn't mean they don't have to act on behalf of trademark / copyright owners. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jackwanders
Mar 23, 2016
@jacksonrayhamilton thanks for the script; I made a tweak to output the full install path for any of @azer's packages found in a project:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
curl https://gist.githubusercontent.com/azer/db27417ee84b5f34a6ea/raw/50ab7ef26dbde2d4ea52318a3590af78b2a21162/gistfile1.txt \
| sed 's/^\(.*\)$/\/\1$/' \
> ~/suspicious-packages.txt \
&& npm ls --parseable \
| grep -f ~/suspicious-packages.txtThis gave me the output:
/Users/jackwanders/some-project/node_modules/babel/node_modules/babel-core/node_modules/line-numbers/node_modules/left-padHopefully this might help others determine how to proceed if they are relying on any of these packages.
jackwanders
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@jacksonrayhamilton thanks for the script; I made a tweak to output the full install path for any of @azer's packages found in a project: #!/usr/bin/env bash
curl https://gist.githubusercontent.com/azer/db27417ee84b5f34a6ea/raw/50ab7ef26dbde2d4ea52318a3590af78b2a21162/gistfile1.txt \
| sed 's/^\(.*\)$/\/\1$/' \
> ~/suspicious-packages.txt \
&& npm ls --parseable \
| grep -f ~/suspicious-packages.txtThis gave me the output: /Users/jackwanders/some-project/node_modules/babel/node_modules/babel-core/node_modules/line-numbers/node_modules/left-padHopefully this might help others determine how to proceed if they are relying on any of these packages. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
sphvn
Mar 23, 2016
Surely Kik could have just spent 5 seconds to realise that the NPM package had nothing to do with anything related to them. Solid effort on notifying a bunch of people as to what happened though.
Like others have said, his code can do what he wants with it, it's open source if you wish to republish then do so, rather than complain.
sphvn
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Surely Kik could have just spent 5 seconds to realise that the NPM package had nothing to do with anything related to them. Solid effort on notifying a bunch of people as to what happened though. Like others have said, his code can do what he wants with it, it's open source if you wish to republish then do so, rather than complain. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
iroy2000
Mar 23, 2016
Our build job caught that left-pad issues fortunately and we ended up upgrading one of our npm modules to its latest version which solve the problem, and my co-worker just swear in the team chatroom :)
iroy2000
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Our build job caught that |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
thesoftwarejedi
Mar 23, 2016
This is a great example of why decentralizing the package hosting can solve the problem. If package hosting were done via a technology such as zeronet and torrents, this could be entirely avoided.
I'll be looking into this in the coming months.
thesoftwarejedi
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
This is a great example of why decentralizing the package hosting can solve the problem. If package hosting were done via a technology such as zeronet and torrents, this could be entirely avoided. I'll be looking into this in the coming months. |
lamont-granquist
referenced this issue
Mar 23, 2016
Open
No user interface to remove old cookbooks. #954
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
stevemao
Mar 23, 2016
Owner
@azer transfer the module to me please
|
@azer transfer the module to me please |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
azer
Mar 23, 2016
Collaborator
@stevemao is the new owner of the module, not sure how he can take the npm ownership.
|
@stevemao is the new owner of the module, not sure how he can take the npm ownership. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks @azer |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
xzer
Mar 23, 2016
Thanks @azer, you did right thing which makes us understand how the npm is dangerous to us, open source developers. You did perfect warning to all the world to tell us do not trust the bullshit npm any more.
To be honest, great work!
xzer
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
Thanks @azer, you did right thing which makes us understand how the npm is dangerous to us, open source developers. You did perfect warning to all the world to tell us do not trust the bullshit npm any more. To be honest, great work! |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
isaacs
Mar 23, 2016
@KoryNunn @SomeoneWeird @zerkms @drewhamlett If you run npm as root, it'll process.setuid() to a nobody user. https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scripts#user
isaacs
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@KoryNunn @SomeoneWeird @zerkms @drewhamlett If you run npm as root, it'll |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
KoryNunn
Mar 23, 2016
@isaacs that is really good. There are however many other malicious things that can be done without sudo, like grabbing private keys.
KoryNunn
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
@isaacs that is really good. There are however many other malicious things that can be done without sudo, like grabbing private keys. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
f
commented
Mar 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
winterbe
Mar 23, 2016
I don't wanna imagine what happens when tomorrow someone trademarks Lodash and wreaks havoc.
Maybe it's time to add an exclusion clause to Open Source licenses for companies like Kik?
BTW: Ask one of 80 million germans about Kik and they'll recognize a completely different company.
winterbe
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
I don't wanna imagine what happens when tomorrow someone trademarks Lodash and wreaks havoc. Maybe it's time to add an exclusion clause to Open Source licenses for companies like Kik? BTW: Ask one of 80 million germans about Kik and they'll recognize a completely different company. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
@f teşekkür ederim anlayışın ve desteğin için Fatih :) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
tjacobs
Mar 23, 2016
This is why Docker exists. Because dependency management is trouble. Pack it all into one package. Do we need a Docker for JS?
tjacobs
commented
Mar 23, 2016
|
This is why Docker exists. Because dependency management is trouble. Pack it all into one package. Do we need a Docker for JS? |
azer
closed this
Mar 23, 2016
Repository owner
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Mar 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
1.1.0 is released :) |

silkentrance commentedMar 22, 2016
When building projects on travis, or when searching for left-pad on npmjs.com, both will report that the package cannot be found.
Here is an excerpt from the travis build log
And here is the standard npmjs.com error page https://www.npmjs.com/package/left-pad
However, if I remove left-pad from my local npm cache and then reinstall it using npm it will happily install left-pad@0.0.4.