Skip to content
Pattern-defeating quicksort (merged into rust-lang/rust)
Branch: master
Clone or download
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
benches
src
.gitignore
.travis.yml
Cargo.toml
LICENSE-APACHE
LICENSE-MIT
README.md

README.md

Pattern-defeating quicksort

Build Status License Cargo Documentation

This sort is significantly faster than slice::sort in Rust. In particular, it sorts random arrays of integers approximately 45% faster. The key drawback is that it is an unstable sort (i.e. may reorder equal elements). However, in most cases stability doesn't matter anyway.

The algorithm is based on pdqsort by Orson Peters, published at: https://github.com/orlp/pdqsort

Now in stable Rust

If you're using Rust 1.20 or newer, you don't need this crate. The sort is now implemented in libcore.

Use it like this:

let mut v = [-5, 4, 1, -3, 2];

v.sort_unstable();
assert!(v == [-5, -3, 1, 2, 4]);

See documentation for more information.

Properties

  • Best-case running time is O(n).
  • Worst-case running time is O(n log n).
  • Unstable, i.e. may reorder equal elements.
  • Does not allocate additional memory.
  • Uses #![no_std].

Examples

extern crate pdqsort;

let mut v = [-5i32, 4, 1, -3, 2];

pdqsort::sort(&mut v);
assert!(v == [-5, -3, 1, 2, 4]);

pdqsort::sort_by(&mut v, |a, b| b.cmp(a));
assert!(v == [4, 2, 1, -3, -5]);

pdqsort::sort_by_key(&mut v, |k| k.abs());
assert!(v == [1, 2, -3, 4, -5]);

A simple benchmark

Sorting 10 million random numbers of type u64:

Sort Time
pdqsort 370 ms
slice::sort 668 ms
quickersort 777 ms
rdxsort 602 ms
You can’t perform that action at this time.