Add basic RTC API - #26
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Build fails for STM32L0x1 due to warnings. Will fix shortly. |
hannobraun
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 12, 2019 10:09
Contributor
Author
|
There was also another problem that was masked by the first: The RTC example only works on STM32L0x2. Everything's fixed now. Pull request has been rebased. I've rolled the fixes into the existing commits. This is ready for review now. |
Member
|
You rock! Thanks again for all your recent PRs! |
Contributor
Author
Thank you :-) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds a very basic RTC API. It can be used to read and set the time, but no alarms or other interrupts are supported yet. There are also a few commits adding general debug stuff to the
timemodule, as that was useful to me while I developed this.I'm marking this PR as a draft, as it's based on #25. Otherwise, this is ready to review.
cc @lthiery