Comparison to similar projects

Fausto NA edited this page Jul 12, 2017 · 14 revisions

There are a lot of other libraries out there for achieving a similar goal than redux-belt does. On this page we elaborate a little bit about what we do different and why.


  • We offer the possibility of namespacing actions as a way to reduce boilerplate.

  • Our actions reflect network operations, which take time to complete and have a potential for failure. An action starts, runs and eventually succeeds or fails, hence the _SUCCESS and _FAILURE action types.


  • We wanted to create a very minimal abstraction of reducers. So we don't have something like createReducer that looks very different from original redux.

  • For CRUD operations, we provide a reducer that composes with your existing reducers, and patterns that go with it, so you can realize most common operations without boilerplate and adjust it to your needs.


  • We encourage the use of redux-saga and patterns that compose well with it.
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.