Repository navigation
Added disabled option for LiveEditor so that it does not steal focus - Closes issue #2409 - #2423
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
…from endpoint textbox after every character input
Collaborator
|
Perfect, thank you very much! I tested it on the Vercel preview URL and it works perfectly now I believe. |
pwizla
added
source: repo
pwizla
changed the title
pwizla
removed
the
temp - port to docs-next
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does it do?
Added disabled option for LiveEditor so that it does not steal focus from endpoint textbox after every character input
Why is it needed?
The LiveEditor was stealing focus from endpoint input box. This seems to be an issue with the LiveEditor using useEditable hook.
Related issue(s)/PR(s)
#2409