CM improvements #8456
Merged
CM improvements #8456
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Front/relational fields
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
… into core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/relational-fields #8456 +/- ##
=============================================================
+ Coverage 33.51% 34.59% +1.07%
=============================================================
Files 1231 1263 +32
Lines 13850 14043 +193
Branches 1398 1395 -3
=============================================================
+ Hits 4642 4858 +216
+ Misses 8298 8293 -5
+ Partials 910 892 -18
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
soupette
changed the base branch from
features/relational-fields
to
feature/relational-fields
…into core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
soupette
force-pushed
the
core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
branch
from
8394057 to
37913d4
Compare
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
soupette
force-pushed
the
core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
branch
from
0515853 to
065aecb
Compare
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
soupette
force-pushed
the
core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
branch
from
aa1c400 to
e1dfc58
Compare
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois AUBEUT <contact@mexar.fr>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
…split Migrate RBAC views to new API format
…/strapi into MeXaaR-feature/duplicate-document
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
MeXaaR feature/duplicate document
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
…pi/strapi into relational-fields/split-st-ct-front
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Relational fields/split st ct front
…into core/cm-refacto-ediview-container
Signed-off-by: soupette <cyril.lpz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does it do?
This PR improves the front-end code of the content manager.
Why is it needed?
In order to split the logic between the single types and the collection types, fix some bugs and allow a better extension for new features and also to display the relational fields
Related issue(s)/PR(s)