Skip to content

/ stratis-storage.github.io

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Stratis software design document: Claim towards BTRFS without basis?! #1

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Stratis software design document: Claim towards BTRFS without basis?! #1

ghost opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jun 25, 2018

According to this document
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
At page 4 , section 1.2

It is claimed that BTRFS has significant technical issues that may never be resolved.

Trying to validate that claim I can not find any basis for it (ref: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg78114.html ).

Please update the document with either the relevant information or change the text to something more meaningful describing why BTRFS is unsuitable.
@agrover
Copy link

@agrover agrover commented Jun 25, 2018

OK, probably better to just say "Btrfs has no licensing issues, but maintaining up-to-date-support for in it in enterprise kernels proved difficult."
@agrover
Copy link

@agrover agrover commented Jun 26, 2018

fixed by stratis-storage/stratis-docs#91
@agrover agrover closed this Jun 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant
@agrover
You can’t perform that action at this time.