respond_to? :business_tax_id=

[msroot]

Hi

I am trying to set a value to an account but doent respond_to business_tax_id

with another field it works:

[21] pry(#<Grape::Endpoint>)> account.legal_entity.address.respond_to? :city=
=> true

but with business_tax_id
[10] pry(#<Grape::Endpoint>)> account.legal_entity.respond_to? :business_tax_id=
=> false

ALSO:
How is it possible not to respond_to? :business_tax_id= but here its works?

[15] pry(#<Grape::Endpoint>)> account.legal_entity.business_tax_id = "123456789"
=> "123456789"
[16] pry(#<Grape::Endpoint>)> account.save; nil
=> nil
[17] pry(#<Grape::Endpoint>)> account.legal_entity.business_tax_id_provided
=> true

[remi-stripe]

@msroot The business_tax_id can be set via the API but it's never returned afterwards. It's considered sensitive information the same way you can set the card number via the API and not retrieve it.

To confirm that you have set that value in the past we surface business_tax_id_provided as you mentioned which allows you to check whether it's been set or not.

[remi-stripe]

@msroot The business_tax_id can be set via the API but it's never returned afterwards. It's considered sensitive information the same way you can set the card number via the API and not retrieve it.

To confirm that you have set that value in the past we surface business_tax_id_provided as you mentioned which allows you to check whether it's been set or not.

[msroot]

@remistr thank for your response

I know same will happen with ssn_last_4_provided personal_id_number_provided

but what i am saying is why doent respond as a method

account.legal_entity.respond_to? :business_tax_id=

[msroot]

@remistr thank for your response

I know same will happen with ssn_last_4_provided personal_id_number_provided

but what i am saying is why doent respond as a method

account.legal_entity.respond_to? :business_tax_id=

[brandur]

but what i am saying is why doent respond as a method

Hey @msroot, this works via the sometimes useful and highly questionable Ruby metaprogramming feature of method_missing. Here's a link to the responsible code for inspection. I'm not crazy about the design, but it's what we have for now :)

Anyway, I'm closing this issue out for now. Let me know if you have any other questions. (And thanks @remistr!)

[brandur]

but what i am saying is why doent respond as a method

Hey @msroot, this works via the sometimes useful and highly questionable Ruby metaprogramming feature of method_missing. Here's a link to the responsible code for inspection. I'm not crazy about the design, but it's what we have for now :)

Anyway, I'm closing this issue out for now. Let me know if you have any other questions. (And thanks @remistr!)