Reading: Add F&P materials #2780
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
selfie |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Who is this PR for?
K5 reading folks
What problem does this PR fix?
There were only a few levels of F&P materials. The overall educational design intent is to support better problem solving by focusing conversation on more concrete and tangible aspects of teaching and learning reading.
What does this PR do?
Adds in images for F&P materials levels A-Z. These are large images, and we can optimize their compression or sizing in a separate pass.
Separately, fixes bug in detecting Storybook and swapping the image asset path (maybe from a Storybook upgrade, not sure).
Adds two stories for looking at these.
Screenshot (if adding a client-side feature)
Story unrolling pages at each level:
Checklists
Which features or pages does this PR touch?
Does this PR use tests to help verify we can deploy these changes quickly and confidently?