You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I understand, this is supposed to be the baseline described in the paper, which I'm not quite sure though.
One thing I found a bit confusing for me is that the threshold for mask head (i.e. for Masker) is set as 0.01 here. Shouldn't it be 0.5 after applying sigmoid()?
I've noticed that you moved sigmoid() from post-process to predictor. However, I suppose that won't change values feeding into Masker, right? Also, I'd like to know why such a move with sigmoid() is necessary?
I reviewed the code history and found the commit postprocess Mask by HardThreshold.
As far as I understand, this is supposed to be the baseline described in the paper, which I'm not quite sure though.
One thing I found a bit confusing for me is that the threshold for mask head (i.e. for Masker) is set as 0.01 here. Shouldn't it be 0.5 after applying sigmoid()?
I've noticed that you moved sigmoid() from post-process to predictor. However, I suppose that won't change values feeding into Masker, right? Also, I'd like to know why such a move with sigmoid() is necessary?
Looking forward to your reply! @JingChaoLiu @liuxuebo0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: