docs: clarify the meaning of content #485
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@YoonHan is attempting to deploy a commit to the Svelte Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
geoffrich
reviewed
Aug 20, 2023
content/tutorial/02-advanced-svelte/07-composition/02-named-slots/README.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Geoff Rich <4992896+geoffrich@users.noreply.github.com>
YoonHan
changed the title
geoffrich
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2023
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think there is such a trivial matter.When I opened
<Card>component file(Card.svelte), I got nothing related to<span slot="telephone">inside of that file and instead found it inside of<App>component!--- UPDATED (24 Aug 2023) ---
I misunderstood the meaning of the instruction.
@geoffrich gave me a better approach. So I changed the title and description of this PR