fix: correctly reschedule deferred effects when reviving a batch after async work

[Rich-Harris]

Simpler alternative to #17101. The bug here was that if an effect was scheduled during traversal, causing a follow-up traversal, an effect that was previously deferred would (having been marked CLEAN) incorrectly go into the #maybe_dirty_effects bucket rather than back into the #dirty_effects bucket. The solution is to persist the dirty bucket between runs.

Since block effects run immediately during traversal, they are always made CLEAN immediately, and so should be added to the #dirty_effects bucket straight away rather than being handled in a separate block_effects array — this allows us to simplify the effect target a little bit.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
• Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
• This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
• Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
• If this PR changes code within packages/svelte/src, add a changeset (npx changeset).

Tests and linting

• Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 425937a

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
svelte	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@17332

[elliott-with-the-longest-name-on-github]

LGTM