Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenType shaping parameter #1

Closed
svgeesus opened this issue Dec 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

OpenType shaping parameter #1

svgeesus opened this issue Dec 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner

From Grzegorz Rolek ‏@grzegorzrolek
https://twitter.com/grzegorzrolek/status/662471907674079232

@nattokirai @svgeesus BTW, wouldn't OT shaping parameter be better named ‘OTL’? ‘OTF’ is often used vs TTF WRT outline data. @TiroTypeworks

@grzegorzrolek
Copy link

Yes, the rationale is that ‘OpenType Layout’ is the term used by Microsoft and others to describe text shaping capabilities of OpenType (https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/TTOCHAP1.htm) and ‘OTL’ is a commonly used initialism. It has proved very useful in situations where ‘OTF’ would often be ambiguous.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner Author

svgeesus commented Jan 6, 2016

Arguments in favour of OTL seem sound. I see no downside to changing it - does anyone else? Suggest we accept the change and close this issue.

@svgeesus svgeesus added the bug label Jan 10, 2016
@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner Author

svgeesus commented Feb 5, 2016

Indeed the introduction says
perhaps "TTF", "OTF" or "SFNT" (the names of
commonly used TrueType and OpenType font formats
which is clearly using OTF as a format not as a layout type. I'm going to commit the change to OTL for this parameter.

@svgeesus svgeesus closed this as completed Feb 5, 2016
svgeesus added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants