Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

IETF nits #9

Closed
svgeesus opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

IETF nits #9

svgeesus opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
editorial

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner

@svgeesus svgeesus commented Jan 29, 2016

Fix nits at
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-00.txt
@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner Author

@svgeesus svgeesus commented Jan 29, 2016

** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section
2.2 of http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case
when there are no actions for IANA.)

** The document seems to lack separate sections for Informative/Normative
References. All references will be assumed normative when checking for
downward references.

** The document seems to lack a both a reference to RFC 2119 and the
recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119
keywords.

 RFC 2119 keyword, line 462: '...ignature field in the WOFF header MUST...'
 RFC 2119 keyword, line 512: '...ignature field in the WOFF header MUST...'

@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner Author

@svgeesus svgeesus commented Jan 29, 2016

The document does not itself need a reference to RFC 2119. However, it quotes other specifications which do user (and reference) RFC 2119. This is a checker false positive; not clear how to handle it.

svgeesus added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2016
@svgeesus
Add explicit references
100fcc2 
Add Normative and Informative references, plus RFC2119 ref, satisfying
part of #9
Add reference to CSS3 Fonts, closing #4
Add OFF, WOFF1, WOFF2 refs.
@svgeesus
Copy link
Owner Author

@svgeesus svgeesus commented Feb 3, 2016

2119 and Normative/Informative now corrected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@svgeesus