New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider re-ordering Lesson 04 - Tracking Changes #411

csbailey5t opened this Issue May 19, 2017 · 3 comments


None yet
6 participants

csbailey5t commented May 19, 2017

At the moment, the lesson seems to proceed by teaching the code and process before teaching the conceptual model underlying git commits, in this case understanding the idea of the staging area and the movement from untracked to tracked/staging area to part of the git history. This does mean that git commands create output for which there is not much conceptual framework to understand to explain to students, such as:

use "git rm --cached <file>..." to unstage

When this appears as a result of git status after git add early in the lesson, it could be difficult to explain should a student ask about it. There are ways to answer or delay answering.

This points more generally to a question of whether the conceptual framework that explains git adds and commits should be front-loaded into the lesson, so that in teaching adding or committing, one could directly refer to how the git commands move information according to the conceptual model. For some people, having the visual that is introduced later in the lesson given and explained early might give the commands more meaning than they have abstracted from the model.


This comment has been minimized.

misssoft commented Sep 26, 2017

After trying out teaching this session as my practice in the training course, I have the same concern that the conceptual framework should be taken in the front. The visual part is quite good and it would be better to bring up to the front for the learner to have an overview in the mind before trying the commands.


This comment has been minimized.

allisongofman commented Jan 31, 2018

I agree with this feedback - I also did this session during my training course and found myself adding more theory and motivation at the beginning because going straight through didn't feel like it provided enough context or explanation for a novice. The analogy of the staging area and photograph would be useful earlier on.


This comment has been minimized.

djinnome commented Jan 31, 2018

I couldn't agree more. In fact, I found that drawing visualizations on the whiteboard that provide context for the command is far more useful to do prior to typing the command than afterwards. It transforms the exercise from being a weird incantation that doesn't seem to have any visible consequences into a weird incantation that enables you to navigate the nodes of the finite state machine that is git.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment