Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade style 9.5.3 #52

wants to merge 309 commits into
base: gh-pages


None yet
Copy link

commented May 28, 2019

In preparation for the June 2019 release, we are going through the repositories to check for broken links and other issues.

This PR upgrades this repo to using the most recent version of the lesson template. It also removes permalinks in the form of /setup/ for instance. We found that using this approach makes the site unusable offline.

It looks like several links in the discuss and reference pages refer to old episodes for which the content has moved around. Double check 5e165c1 to ensure the mapping is still accurate.

There is a link for the entry infective in the glossary that is not defined.

Let me know if you have any questions.

jcoliver and others added some commits Jan 10, 2018

Merge pull request #205 from rgaiacs/gh-pages
Add current year to copyright of workshop footer
Merge pull request #206 from rgaiacs/gh-pages
Fix broken link for Contact
Merge pull request #209 from rgaiacs/gh-pages
Related with lesson-example/pull/172
Merge pull request #213 from ErinBecker/update-coc
Remove out-of-date CoC language
Update Trademark
Close #211
Improve language on CONTRIBUTING file
As @marwahaha said

> "master repository" feels overloaded,
> since typically "master" refers to a branch name.

We are going to use "originating repository".
Merge pull request #224 from fmichonneau/update-gh-labels
Update with new GitHub labels
Merge pull request #225 from swcarpentry/jduck-coc
Updating to handbook as canonical source for CoC

rgaiacs and others added some commits Dec 19, 2018

Merge pull request #379 from maxim-belkin/lesson-links lesson-specific links
Clarify wording of PR & issue templates
I see lots of contributions where none of this placeholder text has
been deleted, but also quite a lot where the first line has been deleted,
but the 'ext below' hasn't (exactly in accordance with the current
Merge pull request #386 from gcapes/clarify-templates
Clarify wording of PR & issue templates
Colorize all boxes
Use the same colors but apply 12.5% opacity.

Solution boxes use 30% opacity
Prefix code blocks with language names
Also, improve contrast of comments

Signed-off-by: Maxim Belkin <>
reference to the webpage of the lesson + goodfirst
This contribution adds reference to the web page of the lesson in the Carpentries and makes it easier for visitors who want to contribute to get familiar with the good first issue badge.
This adds a list of current maintainers to the
gold colour to badge
gold looks more like the yellow from the original badge
use ndash as separator
display it only if both `page.title` and `site.title` are defined.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.