New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using backticks rather than quotes for special functions #280

Open
webbedfeet opened this Issue Jun 13, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@webbedfeet

webbedfeet commented Jun 13, 2017

Hello,

I would like to suggest an improvement to the "Seeking Help" episode (03-seeking-help.md).

For the special functions you suggest ?"+", for example. Can I suggest changing or at least showing the option of using backticks, i.e., @@###?`+`. I personally like the distinction of reserving backticks for function specifications to avoid confusion with strings. I understand that the markdown might be a bit trickier to write, but for a new learner keeping functions separate from strings might be a good idea

Abhijit

@naupaka

This comment has been minimized.

Member

naupaka commented Jun 16, 2017

Hi @webbedfeet thanks for the suggestion. I think you are right to pick up on the fact that this is a bit confusing, and on how the not-so-obvious difference between quoted strings vs quoted infix functions.

My personal preference would be to just take it out altogether, and just demonstrate the use of the ? for help on a normal function, like ?plot. IMO, using backticks for infix operators seems a little in the weeds for so early in the material.

fmichonneau pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 19, 2018

Merge pull request #280 from katrinleinweber/patch-3
Rename CoC file to align with GitHub's Community Profile expectation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment