ARC: Add Authentication-Results: field (AR), if useful one is not found#1453
Merged
Conversation
- arc_parameters & dkim_parameters use them each other as default. - arc_srvid uses signer_domain of ARC or DKIM as default. - Renamed subparameters for ARC.
ikedas
changed the title
…(AR) about DKIM signature verification, add them, as done for ARC. Conversely, if trusted AR(s) exist, now authentication information will be taken from them.
ikedas
force-pushed
the
add_ar_by_self
branch
from
8b99538 to
7ec2103
Compare
ikedas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2022
ARC: When ARC seal was added, DKIM signing should be forced (#1450) Forwarded messages should also be ARC sealed if possible ARC: Add Authentication-Results: field (AR), if useful one is not found Following typo fix in Mail::DKIM::ARC::Signer
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See discussion on #1450.