I have no experience with the notebook format...perhaps someone else can handle this.
For reference (since I managed to get the notebook to work :D), the example file looks like this when rendered:
Hmm, seems you don't have mathjax working.
I think the general "consensus" was to put the notebooks in examples/notebooks (ie. not to use the currentl begginer/intermediate/advanced directory structure), but maybe something else was decided while I wasn't looking. What is the status of this, anyway? I thought we already had some notebooks as part of GCI, but I don't see them anywhere. @asmeurer?
EDIT: Other than that, I've no idea on this; I haven't yet taken the time to get notebooks to work, though I intend to do so. :)
Right, I'll move the notebook files.
Should be ready now.
We never added them. I think there was only one that was good enough to include. It should still be on melange.
This was the one http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2011/7129292
Let's put notebooks in the normal structure (beginning, intermediate, advanced), so we don't have to sort through them when we convert everything to notebooks.
Limit examples from Gruntz' thesis collected in an IPython notebook
Remove duplicated and add missing Gruntz tests
Moved notebook file to correct location
Small fix of limit examples
Updated limit examples notebook
Moved limit examples notebook to tutorial directory
Can this go in? There was discussion about using notebook format version 2 instead of 3. Is this still an issue?
I am +1 to merge this. If there are no further objections, I'll merge it soon.
Ipython 0.13 was released last week so the issue with the version is not as burning as it was.
@certik gave a +1.
I am merging this in a few hours if there are no new issues. Are there any, @raoulb?
Are there any
Are there any
I'm not aware of any open task on this PR.
I wonder why this branch was never tested by the bot?
The automatic script that I was using does not check older pull requests (due to some unknown to me detail of the github api). I do not know why travis did not check it.
I suppose that I should have checked the whole discussion page, not only the last few comments. I am sorry, I will try to see where the error comes from.