-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Bugfix/prod 399 triggered prediction error on public api production at 2022 07 29 t 16 07 15 529 z #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gorskysd
merged 10 commits into
main
from
bugfix/PROD-399-triggered-prediction-error-on-public-api-production-at-2022-07-29-t-16-07-15-529-z
Sep 9, 2022
Merged
Bugfix/prod 399 triggered prediction error on public api production at 2022 07 29 t 16 07 15 529 z #12
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a2724fd
Decoupled extractor and eventlog builder for better integration with …
da6c6d7
Fixed bug where rollover_id diff was not sorted correctly
8f51f30
Fixed cli
68c5ff5
incremented version
85c956a
Formatting
873c17f
More formatting
9d97e86
more formatting
bfc0675
Modify cli to allow paths with special characters
53c27ce
Fixed bad_eventlog tests
c16cff4
fixed type hints
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | ||
| """Tools for providing Spark event log""" | ||
|
|
||
| __version__ = "0.1.1" | ||
| __version__ = "0.1.2" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file not shown.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice abstraction. I made an error when I coded the first version of this thinking that assertRaises will assert that the value of its "msg" argument matches that of the attribute of the exception. That's not the case: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertRaises
I should've done,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! Had to fix some of the error messages to match, too.
btw, curious why you went went unittest here instead of using pytest's exception testing capabilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't recall having made a deliberate choice between the 2, but I'm interested in differences that may exist between the 2 or examples with the pytest alternative. I do like that these related tests are grouped in a class, and that class offers
assertRaises... felt rightThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I just Googled "python test raise exception": https://stackoverflow.com/questions/129507/how-do-you-test-that-a-python-function-throws-an-exception