build-system: bring back 'nonnull'

[evverx]

Having taken a look at https://github.com/systemd/systemd/runs/645252074?check_suite_focus=true
where fuzz-journal-remote failed with

AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==16==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7f864f98948e bp 0x7ffde5c6b7c0 sp 0x7ffde5c6b560 T0)
==16==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==16==Hint: address points to the zero page.
SCARINESS: 10 (null-deref)
    #0 0x7f864f98948e in output_short /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/shared/logs-show.c
    #1 0x7f864f984624 in show_journal_entry /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/shared/logs-show.c:1154:15
    #2 0x7f864f984b63 in show_journal /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/shared/logs-show.c:1239:21
    #3 0x4cabab in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/fuzz/fuzz-journal-remote.c:67:21
    #4 0x51fd16 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:556:15
    #5 0x51c330 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool*) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:470:3
    #6 0x523700 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::__1::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:765:7
    #7 0x5246cd in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__1::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:792:3
    #8 0x4de3d1 in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp:824:6
    #9 0x4cfb47 in main /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp:19:10
    #10 0x7f864e69782f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2082f)
    #11 0x41f2a8 in _start (out/fuzz-journal-remote+0x41f2a8)

AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/shared/logs-show.c in output_short
==16==ABORTING
MS: 0 ; base unit: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0x44,0x3d,0xa,0x5f,0x5f,0x52,0x45,0x41,0x4c,0x54,0x49,0x4d,0x45,0x5f,0x54,0x49,0x4d,0x45,0x53,0x54,0x41,0x4d,0x50,0x3d,0x31,0xa,0xa,
D=\x0a__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP=1\x0a\x0a
artifact_prefix='./'; Test unit written to ./crash-d635b9dd31cceff3c912fd45e1a58d7e90f0ad73
Base64: RD0KX19SRUFMVElNRV9USU1FU1RBTVA9MQoK

I was wondering why it hadn't been caught by the compiler even though clang should have failed to compile it with

../src/shared/logs-show.c:624:25: warning: null passed to a callee that requires a non-null argument [-Wnonnull]
                        print_multiline(f, 4 + fieldlen + 1, 0, OUTPUT_FULL_WIDTH, 0, false,
                        ^
../src/shared/logs-show.c:161:24: note: callee declares array parameter as static here
                size_t highlight[static 2]) {
                       ^        ~~~~~~~~~~
../src/shared/logs-show.c:1239:21: warning: null passed to a callee that requires a non-null argument [-Wnonnull]
                r = show_journal_entry(f, j, mode, n_columns, flags, NULL, NULL, ellipsized);
                    ^                                                      ~~~~
../src/shared/logs-show.c:1133:30: note: callee declares array parameter as static here
                const size_t highlight[static 2],
                             ^        ~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

Given that judging by #13039 it doesn't seem to be
the first time issues like that have been missed I think it would be better to turn nonnull on
and get around false positives on a case-by-case basis with DISABLE_WARNING_NONNULL .. REENABLE_WARNING

Reopens #6119

[keszybz]

If CI passes, then let's merge.

[keszybz]

bionic-amd64 failed with with a timeout when rebooting. This patch only affects compilation, so it should be unrelated.