-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set up CI/CD completely with GitHub actions #670
Labels
Build
Building and Packaging (Windows installer, etc.)
Comments
I agree. Feel free to do so. 🙂 https://github.com/t-oster/VisicutBuilder should be a good starting point for the build environment/Docker container.
The visicut repo already contains "distribute.sh" which does 95% of all the building. It only lacks a few details such as the bundled Windows EXE for autotrace. These remaining 5% should be moved over from VisicutBuilder.
|
I already rewrote most of |
#671 introduced a prototype Docker based build system based on the old AppImage-specific Dockerfile. Ideally, this will replace other Docker images to avoid redundancies. |
related: #680 |
This was referenced Mar 1, 2024
Closed
PR available in #710. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
To make development easier and allow contributors to test their changes in the real world before they send PRs, I would like to move CI/CD completely to GitHub actions. This would further allow for continuously deploying VisiCut in the form of a moving tag for which a prerelease can be created (this is what many AppImages do for instance, and the AppImage community provides tools that make this very easy).
In case you feel uncomfortable sharing secrets with GitHub (e.g., for code signing), you could set up a custom runner or perform the final steps on other private infrastructure. Both GitHub actions and any other CI/CD system should share the same scripts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: